Entry № 041-3 / V-4083 · 0:00 synced

Small Form Factor Video Card Showdown - R9 Nano vs 970 Mini

Linus Tech Tips@LinusTechTips415.8K viewsMay 12, 20167:23
Source
YT
Views
415.8K
Subscribers
16.8M
Critic
?
Audience
?

0 up · 0 down · 0 ratings

Channels and socials

We have used the Nano pretty extensively since its release, and quite frankly, we think it's pretty darn awesome. But is it perfect for every situation? TunnelBear message: TunnelBear is the easy-to-use VPN app for mobile and desktop. Visit tunnelbear.com to try it free and save 10% when you sign up for unlimited TunnelBear data. Intel link: linustechtips.com Pricing & discussion: linustechtips.com Support us: linustechtips.com Join our community forum: bit.ly twitter.com @LinusTech Intro Screen Music Credit: Title: Laszlo - Supernova Video Link: youtube.com iTunes Download Link: itunes.apple.com Artist Link: soundcloud.com Outro Screen Music Credit: Approaching Nirvana - Sugar High youtube.com Sound effects provided by freesfx.co.uk

Start
AI OverviewDefault language

The video revisits a long-standing head-to-head between two compact GPUs: the AMD R9 Nano and the Asus GTX 970 Mini. The host starts by recapping the argument that the Nano excels in raw performance but may struggle in less-than-ideal thermal conditions, while the 970 Mini is praised for its smaller form factor and solid efficiency. Detailed specs are laid out for both cards: the Nano packs a Fiji core with 4096 stream processors and 4 GB of high bandwidth memory, all within a compact 5 by 4.38 inch chassis, whereas the 970 Mini carries 1664 CUDA cores, 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit interface, and clocks around 1228 MHz. The discussion then contrasts their historical benchmark results, noting that the Nano generally leads in raw performance, but the 970 Mini can close the gap in terms of thermal output and power efficiency, depending on testing conditions. Prices are compared as well, with the Nano priced around 479 USD and the Mini at 299 USD, highlighting a significant dollars-per-frame consideration. The host acknowledges that the earlier benchmarks are dated and frames the conclusion as a trade-off: the Nano delivers more performance at a premium, while the Mini offers a more budget-friendly, space-saving option for restricted cases.

Topics · hardware · technology · gaming

Questions answered

Which card delivers stronger raw performance according to the comparison?
In raw performance benchmarks, the R9 Nano generally outperforms the GTX 970 Mini, according to the discussion and prior benchmarks cited in the video.
How does airflow affect the Nano and the Mini in small form factor builds?
The Nano can throttle significantly under restricted airflow, reducing clock speeds and making games feel sluggish, whereas the Mini tends to maintain more stable performance under similar airflow constraints, though it runs warmer due to its design. The video recommends ensuring adequate airflow or choosing the Mini if airflow is severely restricted.