Entry № 041-5 / V-1241 · 0:00 synced

SIDEMEN RATE UK YOUTUBERS

MoreSidemen@MoreSidemen4.4M viewsSep 21, 201940:46
Source
YT
Views
4.4M
Subscribers
9.7M
Critic
?
Audience
?

0 up · 0 down · 0 ratings

Channels and socials

#SidemenSaturday • Sidemen: youtube.com • Sidemen Clothing: sidemenclothing.com Have an idea for a compilation/montage or Sidemen Saturday, let us know below! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sidemen: • Miniminter: youtube.com • Zerkaa: youtube.com • Behzinga: youtube.com • Vikkstar123: youtube.com • TBJZL: youtube.com • Wroetoshaw: youtube.com • KSI: youtube.com edited by @tegsrf

Start
AI OverviewDefault language

Sidemen Rate UK YouTubers is a roster-style, debate-driven tier list discussion that walks through how various UK creators might be grouped into tiers such as God Tier, solid, on the cusp, or under the radar. The video opens with applause and an explicit setup: they are ranking based on impact, consistency, and overall influence within the UK YouTube scene. Early on, the panel discusses the place of Alfie and the dynamics of the Beta Squad, noting how individual channels relate to the group as a whole and how viewers perceive separate channels versus collective Sidemen projects. The crew then shifts to evaluating content longevity, with some members described as having faded relevance while others still push strong, consistent output. Throughout, they reference specific creators by name, compare channel histories, and weigh how recent activity affects current standing within the ranking rubric. The conversation blends nostalgia for early content with observations about present-day output, emphasizing consistency, innovation, and audience engagement as critical criteria. They acknowledge that some individuals have diversified into different formats, such as streams or separate brand channels, which influences how they should be categorized in a universal tier list. As the discussion progresses, the team debates the reliability of past fame versus ongoing production quality, often revisiting who has sustained momentum and who may be riding a short-lived spike. The dialogue frequently circles back to the Sidemen channel itself as a reference point for what counts as “god tier” status, while also recognizing independent career trajectories that diverge from the Sidemen path. By the midpoint, the panel attempts to reach consensus, proposing multiple revisions to where each creator belongs, and stressing that the final ranking is a snapshot of the moment, not an absolute prophecy for future success. The later sections explore more borderline cases, with players who might be “on the cusp” or “solid” but lack the universal consensus of top-tier status, and they even discuss hypothetical moves like appearances at press conferences or cross-channel collaborations. In the closing act, the group finalizes a tier list that places Sidemen channel and other major UK creators within a structured hierarchy, while acknowledging continually shifting metrics such as subscriber growth and video longevity. The video ends with a call to action, inviting viewers to submit their own rankings and to share feedback, thereby extending the debate into the community and encouraging ongoing engagement with the Sidemen brand and UK YouTube culture.

Topics · entertainment · social media · ranking · collaboration · comedy · media analysis

Questions answered

What criteria are used to categorize creators in the ranking?
The ranking uses criteria such as overall impact, consistency of content, audience engagement, and longevity of relevance across the creator's career and across group projects versus solo channels.
Which creators are repeatedly discussed as potential god tier candidates?
The discussion highlights Sidemen members and other major UK creators as potential god tier, with emphasis on those who maintain high output and broad influence like DanTDM and KSI, among others mentioned in the debate.
How is consistency treated in the ranking?
Consistency is treated as a core factor; creators who produce steady, ongoing content and maintain audience interest are ranked higher, while those with intermittent output may be placed lower or on the cusp.