LG G5 Review - A true disappointment

LG G5 Review - A true disappointment examines why a phone with standout ambitions still leaves us underwhelmed. The video opens by framing the G5 as a device that seems to have a lot going for it on paper, but quickly pivots to a critique of the practical experience: the camera, the software skin, and the modular concept feel more like compromises than improvements. The reviewer compares the G5 to its contemporaries, notably the Galaxy S7, highlighting the differences in display technology, battery strategy, and everyday usability. He emphasizes that despite a high-end spec sheet, several decisions undermine the overall user experience, including the awkward camera module, the lack of an app tray, and the awkward placement of hardware buttons. By weighing pros and cons against competing devices, he concludes that the G5 fails to deliver a compelling value proposition for most users despite its removable battery and modular approach. The review concludes with a candid verdict that the G5 is not a strong recommendation in a market dominated by more polished rivals, and hints at the need for better follow-up modules or software refinements to salvage its original intent. The middle section delves into performance and display details with concrete measurements and real-world observations. The Snapdragon 820 and 4GB of RAM are described as competent but not extraordinary, with throttling tests showing only a modest drop between peak and sustained performance. The display comparison foregrounds the tradeoffs between LCD and OLED technologies, noting LG’s use of LCD and Samsung’s OLED strategy, and concludes that the G5’s IPS LCD offers true-to-life colors and solid viewing angles at the expense of deeper blacks and some oversaturation in extreme conditions. A dedicated segment discusses the camera experience, where the reviewer criticizes image quality, lack of a quick-launch gesture, and the awkward tactile feel of the modular battery accessory as a reason to avoid the camera in daily use. He also flags the phone’s water resistance as a meaningful factor in personal shooting habits, contrasting it with the removable battery approach. In the final portion, the reviewer discusses software, features, and overall ergonomics, praising some UI improvements like double-tap wake and a recent-apps button, but lamenting the lack of a true app tray and the clumsy app management experience. He identifies the fingerprint sensor placement as a usability flaw for certain hand positions and notes that the device’s price point, combined with the camera’s weaknesses and missing wireless charging, makes the G5 hard to recommend when competing flagships offer more polished and reliable experiences. The sponsorship and accessory plug-ins from dbrand are acknowledged as a separate discussion about customization rather than core device merit. The closing stance is clear: the LG G5 is a bold but imperfect direction that could have been great with more refined software tweaks and better integration of its modular concept.

Topics · technology · consumer_electronics · smartphones · product_reviews · display_technology · hardware_design · mobile_devices