Chrome REALLY Messed Up... (Browser Extensions)
0 up · 0 down · 0 ratings
Promos
Pre-Order the DROP THX Panda Wireless headphones today at dro.ps Are serious threats lurking inside Chrome extensions? Leave a reply with your requests for future episodes, or tweet them here: twitter.com GET MERCH: lttstore.com SUPPORT US ON FLOATPLANE: floatplane.com LTX EXPO: ltxexpo.com AFFILIATES & REFERRALS --------------------------------------------------- Affiliates, Sponsors & Referrals: lmg.gg Get Private Internet Access VPN at lmg.gg Get a Displate Metal Print at lmg.gg Support a Creator code LINUSMEDIAGROUP on Epic Games Store: lmg.gg Get a 30-day free trial of Amazon Prime at lmg.gg Our Test Benches on Amazon: lmg.gg Our Production Gear: lmg.gg FOLLOW US ELSEWHERE --------------------------------------------------- Twitter: twitter.com Facebook: @LinusTech Instagram: @linustech Twitch: twitch.tv FOLLOW OUR OTHER CHANNELS --------------------------------------------------- Linus Tech Tips: lmg.gg TechLinked: lmg.gg ShortCircuit: lmg.gg LMG Clips: lmg.gg Channel Super Fun: lmg.gg Carpool Critics: lmg.gg
The video opens by highlighting a core function of modern browsers: extension support that can improve our browsing experience, such as coupon finders, social media cleanups, and autofill tools. The host stresses that while extensions can boost productivity, a significant security risk lurks because many extensions come from lesser known developers and may not be trustworthy. The module then explains Chrome’s vetting process, including both manual review and automated checks, and compares it to app store approvals to reassure viewers that there is a barrier against bad code. Despite these measures, the creator notes that the Chrome Web Store hosts more than 180,000 extensions, and some malicious ones still slip through. The discussion moves to concrete threats revealed in 2020, where spyware hiding as extensions had tens of millions of downloads and could log keystrokes, harvest credentials, and copy data from the clipboard. The host emphasizes that some extensions even claimed to warn users about risky sites, which illustrates the deceptive nature of some malware. The segment then shifts to practical advice for selecting safer extensions, such as preferring extensions with large install bases and strong, positive reviews, and avoiding ones with vague or poorly written descriptions. It concludes with a cautionary note to assess whether you truly need a given extension, and to scrutinize the extension page for signs of malware, reinforcing that even seemingly useful tools can be dangerous. The second paragraph focuses on actionable safety strategies and sensible usage habits. Viewers are advised to limit exposure by choosing well-reviewed options and to limit unnecessary extensions in order to reduce risk. The host acknowledges that some extensions offer genuinely valuable features for tabs, site-specific enhancements, or workflows, but cautions that many tasks can be accomplished through direct browsing or separate software without relying on extensions. A recurring theme is the importance of verifying reputation before installing, including checking for clunky interfaces or grammatically poor descriptions as red flags. The video also discusses the broader responsibility of Google to tighten its vetting, while noting the risk of losing legitimate tools in the process. It closes with a personal plug for a product and a reminder to engage with the channel for future topics, while underscoring the core message: safety first when extending browser functionality, and thoughtful consideration before trusting any addon.
Topics · technology · cybersecurity · software · internet_safety
Questions answered
- What should I look for when choosing a Chrome extension to minimize risk?
- Choose extensions with large install bases, strong positive reviews, clear and professional descriptions, and a reputable developer. Avoid ones with vague functionality, obfuscated or unclear code, or suspicious permissions.
- Why are malicious extensions still able to slip through Chrome’s vetting process?
- Despite automated and manual reviews, the sheer volume of submissions and the presence of well-disguised malware mean some malicious extensions can slip through, especially those that masquerade as useful tools or warnings.