Entry № 041-8 / V-212 · 0:00 synced

Should You Buy A Radeon RX 7900?

Techquickie@techquickie297.8K viewsJan 3, 20235:35
Source
YT
Views
297.8K
Subscribers
4.3M
Critic
?
Audience
?

0 up · 0 down · 0 ratings

Promos

Thanks to Secretlab for sponsoring today's video! Check them out at lmg.gg Are AMD's new Radeon RX 7900 XT and XTX better buys than their competition from Nvidia? Leave a reply with your requests for future episodes. ► GET MERCH: lttstore.com ► AFFILIATES, SPONSORS & REFERRALS: lmg.gg ► PODCAST GEAR: lmg.gg ► SUPPORT US ON FLOATPLANE: floatplane.com FOLLOW US ELSEWHERE --------------------------------------------------- Twitter: twitter.com Facebook: @LinusTech Instagram: @linustech TikTok: @linustech Twitch: twitch.tv

Start
AI OverviewDefault language

The video examines whether the AMD Radeon RX 7900 series represents a better buy than Nvidia’s RTX 4000 lineup, focusing on value, performance, and power efficiency. The host outlines the price positions: the RX 7900 XT around $900 and the RX 7900 XTX around $1000, while Nvidia’s top cards start higher, with emphasis on whether the Radeon lineup can compete on price without sacrificing too much performance. A core theme is AMD’s chiplet architecture, which AMD argues helps cut costs through better yields by replacing a monolithic die with multiple dies. The presenter explains that chiplets dedicated to memory control and cache rest on a 6 nm process, while the rendering chiplet uses a 5 nm process, and discusses how this impacts manufacturing costs and efficiency. The discussion then pivots to Ray Tracing, noting Nvidia’s stronger emphasis in RT performance, while also acknowledging that many games either do not use RT or do not heavily rely on it, making traditional rasterization and general gaming performance more decisive for most buyers. The host also addresses power consumption concerns, suggesting that chiplet-based designs might carry a power penalty in some scenarios, yet still compares favorably in overall gaming performance in several titles. The commentary moves to future prospects such as AMD’s upcoming FS…R3 upscaling, which could shift value dynamics further if it delivers meaningful frame-rate gains and broad compatibility, though the exact real-world impact remains uncertain until it arrives and matures. The bottom line is that for users who do not care about Ray Tracing and want to save wattage and money, the RX 7900 series can be a strong value choice, while RT enthusiasts may lean toward Nvidia if initial RT performance is a priority, with the caveat to review game-by-game benchmarks before purchasing. In closing, the video invites viewer input on future topics and emphasizes that both teams offer solid options depending on the user’s needs and preferred features, with a reminder to consider real-world benchmarks rather than marketing claims alone.

Topics · technology · hardware · gpu · gaming · reviews · processors · consumer electronics · performance

Questions answered

What should I consider when choosing between RX 7900 XT and RTX 4080 for gaming today?
Consider your priority: if you want top-tier RT performance and future-proofing with DLSS or equivalent, Nvidia may be preferable. If you value price-to-performance and strong rasterization, the RX 7900 XT offers solid gaming performance at a lower cost, with potential for improvement through driver updates and future FS R3 features.
Is Ray Tracing a deciding factor for most games with the RX 7900 series?
Ray Tracing is not universally supported or game-specified in all titles, and many games benefit more from traditional rendering improvements like texture quality and anti-aliasing. For many players, rasterization performance and frame rates may be more noticeable day-to-day than RT features on the RX 7900 series.