The WAN Show - Macbook Pro Selling Like Hotcakes - November 18, 2016
0 up · 0 down · 0 ratings
Promos
Squarespace: squarespace.com offer code LINUS to save 10% Freshbooks: freshbooks.com and enter WAN in the “how did you hear about us” for your free trial Forum link: linustechtips.com Soundcloud Link: soundcloud.com Timestamps courtesy of JJMC89. 00:06:27 - Touch Bar MacBook Pro 00:10:40 - LMG MacBook Pro video 00:18:04 - New MackBook Pro sales 00:26:06 - The balance of power in gaming 00:41:16 - Sponsor: Squarespace 00:44:11 - Sponsor: FreshBooks 00:46:37 - Trump wants NASA to visit Europa 00:52:20 - A PS4 PRO melts down 00:58:02 - Warner Brothers acquires Machinima 01:00:45 - HTC Vive wireless accessory preorder pricing 01:03:06 - Vagina in Watch Dogs 2 01:06:40 - Nintendo Switch pricing 01:10:55 - FBI seized 23 Tor-hidden child porn sites, deployed malware from them 01:14:41 - ATT Stream Saver video quality downgrade 01:19:23 - Google will soon ban fake new sites from using its ad network
The WAN Show episode from November 18, 2016 opens with Linus and the panel discussing a range of tech topics and ongoing conversations about the newly announced MacBook Pro. The hosts frame the show around major headline topics such as the Touch Bar, early impressions from reviewers, and the general reception of Apple’s 2016 MacBook Pro refresh. They reference the hype around the Touch Bar while acknowledging mixed early opinions, particularly about upgradability, battery life, and RAM configuration. The team notes that the MacBook Pro lineup reportedly outsold competing laptops in its first five days, signaling strong initial market demand despite some critical reception from reviewers. The conversation then shifts to broader tech discourse, including gaming hardware dynamics and the evolving landscape of high-end laptops, emphasizing how performance, battery life, and design trade-offs influence purchase decisions. The host banter and light jokes provide a recognizable WAN Show rhythm, balancing serious analysis with humor about public figures and current events of the day. The panel teases upcoming segments and sponsor reads, setting a fast-paced tone for a long-form tech discussion show that blends product analysis with industry news. The initial segments establish a frame for evaluating whether the 2016 MacBook Pro represents a leap forward in user experience or a controversial shift in Apple’s laptop strategy. They also set expectations for the audience about the depth of hardware analysis to come, particularly around memory configurations and thermal/power considerations. The show promises more detailed breakdowns in later blocks, including the RAM power consumption discussion, a deeper look at SSD soldering decisions, and a take on the MacBook Pro sales narrative. They note a focus on how upgrade cycles and space limitations influence device design, hinting at the broader implications for future Apple laptops. The tone remains inclusive of viewer sentiment while prioritizing technical rigor and transparent acknowledgment of mistakes in their earlier conclusions. The hosts acknowledge the complexity of hardware design decisions and the multiplicity of factors that drive product specs beyond simple power consumption. The discussion transitions into how third-party outlets and tech press interpret battery life, and why real-world usage can diverge from manufacturer claims. The episode then moves into a review-style examination of the MacBook Pro, including design choices like SSDs soldered to the logic board and the subsequent impact on repairability and upgradability. Throughout, the panel debates the reliability of battery-life claims and the feasibility of a hypothetical 32GB RAM option in the 2016 MacBook Pro, weighing space constraints and heat management against consumer upgrade expectations. The conversation remains anchored in a practical hardware methodology discussion, exploring DDR4 and LPDDR3 memory ecosystems and their relative power profiles, with transparent caveats about voltage and architectural differences. The show also dives into the broader PC gaming ecosystem, using data-driven discussion to compare integrated versus discrete GPUs, and how these choices affect gaming performance and overall power strategy. As the RAM and power topic deepens, Linus and the team acknowledge the nuance in interpreting benchmarking results and emphasize that multiple variables,power, heat dissipation, and PCB space,drive the final product decisions. The hosts pivot to a data-driven view of MacBook Pro sales versus other laptops, critiquing the reliability of certain market analyses while highlighting the significance of component orders and panel data in drawing conclusions about consumer demand. They present a straw poll to gauge audience opinions on the controversial design decisions, then compare fan reception to the real-world utility of the Touch Bar and the overall MacBook Pro value proposition. The show closes sponsor segments with a practical pitch on Squarespace and FreshBooks, transitioning back to ongoing coverage of tech headlines like VR hardware, gaming laptops, and government or industry news that intersects with consumer tech. In sum, the WAN Show blends humor, community engagement, and technical scrutiny to dissect a pivotal moment in laptop hardware, while acknowledging the limitations of data and the importance of multiple design trade-offs in modern computing devices.
Topics · technology · gadgets · gaming · hardware · media-technology
Questions answered
- Why did the 2016 MacBook Pro not offer a 32GB RAM option, despite expectations?
- The panel explains that the Skylake CPU in that model supports only up to 16GB LPDDR3 on a single channel, and dual-channel or higher configurations would have required more PCB space and different memory architecture, affecting power and heat. This limitation, combined with space constraints, led to the 16GB maximum in that generation.
- Do reviewers generally agree that the MacBook Pro outsold competitors in its first five days?
- Yes, multiple outlets cited that the MacBook Pro outsold competing laptops in the first five days, though the data often came from component orders or panel data rather than official company-reported sales figures.