ZOTAC GTX 970 AMP! Extreme & Omega Video Card Review & a Surprise
0 up · 0 down · 0 ratings
Channels and socials
ZOTAC sent us their two beastly editions of the GTX 970. These cards look pretty darn cool in my opinion, but do they overclock as well as their flashy design would suggest? Detailed in-game settings: bit.ly Sponsor link: linustechtips.com Pricing & discussion: linustechtips.com Support us: linustechtips.com Graphics Card Overclocks Master Sheet: docs.google.com Join our community forum: bit.ly twitter.com @LinusTech Intro Screen Music Credit: Adhesive Wombat -
Check out his channel here: youtube.com Outro Screen Music Credit: Approaching Nirvana - Sugar High youtube.com
The video kicks off with Linus presenting the GeForce GTX 970 as a remarkable value proposition, highlighting features such as Dynamic Super Resolution, Multiframe Anti-Aliasing, and the architecture’s power efficiency. He notes the GTX 970’s mainstream appeal and explains that availability has been spotty, prompting a closer look at Zotac’s two high-end variants, the AMP Omega and AMP Extreme. The installer overview includes a tour of the non-reference boards, showing their enlarged PCBs, dual 8-pin power connectors, and the robust backplates that may affect dual-slot clearance in some systems. He then walks through the basic specifications, ports, and the Firestorm overclocking software, including the external OC+ module for real-time diagnostics and control. The comparison between the Omega and Extreme focuses on cooler design, acoustic performance, and thermal behavior, with Omega using a metal dual-fan shroud and Extra-wide radiator elements while Extreme emphasizes visual style with a carbon-fiber-inspired finish and more prominent LED accents. Overclocking results are discussed, including voltage limits and the practical performance ceiling achieved on both cards, where maximum stable clocks hit around 1546 MHz on the core and 1513 MHz in gaming workloads, staying quietly built under load. Linus shares benchmark outcomes showing that the Zotac models outperform a reference GTX 970 but do not surpass a GTX 980 when pushed to 4K, leading to the conclusion that the choice between Omega and Extreme largely depends on stock availability, case compatibility, and aesthetic preference. Finally, Zotac runs a global giveaway for a GTX 980 AMP Extreme, encouraging viewers to engage in the forum discussion for eligibility, and Linus invites continued support and feedback while noting the subtle tradeoffs of the metallic vs carbon fiber shroud aesthetics. Overall, the review establishes that both Zotac GTX 970 editions deliver solid overclocking potential, strong cooling, and compelling value, with the final decision resting on personal priorities like budget, form factor, and visual design.
Topics · technology review · hardware · graphics cards · performance benchmarking
Questions answered
- What are the key differences between the Zotac GTX 970 AMP Omega and AMP Extreme as highlighted in the review?
- The Omega uses an all-metal dual 90mm fan cooler with a triple-slot design and a focus on quiet operation, while the Extreme features a carbon fiber finished shroud with LED accents and a larger overall aesthetic emphasis; both cards share non-reference PCBs, dual 8-pin power, and similar display outputs, with both delivering strong but not GTX 980-level performance at 4K.
- What overclocking capabilities and limits are reported for the Zotac GTX 970 AMP editions?
- Both cards reached stable observed game clock speeds around 1546 MHz core and 1513 MHz memory in tests; voltage unlocks went up to 1.26V via the OC+ software, but pushing higher triggered power-limit trips and reduced performance, so the reviewer kept voltages conservative for stability.