Were we Wrong about AMD VEGA?? - WAN Show July 7, 2017
0 up · 0 down · 0 ratings
Promos
Try Needforseat's embroidery service at geni.us today! Use offer code LTT to save 10% on Savage Jerky at geni.us For your unrestricted 30 days free trial, go to freshbooks.com and enter in “The WAN Show” in the how you heard about us section. Get your LTX 2017 Ticket here: ticketrocket.co Forum link: linustechtips.com Soundcloud link: soundcloud.com Timestamps courtesy of JJMC89. 00:07:30 - AMD RX Vega leaked benchmark shows it ahead of GTX 1080 00:20:00 - AMD's Ryzen 5 1600 skyrockets to #2 on Amazon 00:27:40 - AMD didn't take 10.4% CPU share from Intel in Q2 2017 00:29:12 - Tesla to build world's biggest lithium ion battery to secure power for South Australia 00:31:20 - German utility announces plans for world's biggest battery 00:32:27 - Sponsor: Freshbooks 00:33:27 - Sponsor: Need for Seat 00:35:12 - Sponsor: Savage Jerky 00:38:04 - Jawbone's demise heralds the end of the wearables industry 00:48:36 - Pornhub now supports interactive toys 00:50:52 - OneDrive has stopped working on non-NTFS drives 00:53:40 - RED phone 00:57:40 - Floatplane Club
The WAN Show episode from July 7, 2017, opens with Linus and Luke engaging in light banter about internet friendships and how people meet online versus in person. They tease a show format and set expectations for several tech topics, including AMD Vega rumors, Ryzen market momentum, and industry shifts. The hosts frame the episode as a mix of analysis, humor, and sponsor segments, promising in-depth discussion of high profile hardware leaks and market moves while maintaining their signature informal style. Early on they pivot to AMD related chatter, acknowledging that the Vega card has generated a lot of speculation and interest, particularly around performance clues and competitive positioning against Nvidia. The conversation highlights the complexity of interpreting leaks and emphasizes that frontiers edition cards can be different from consumer gaming variants, affecting how the public should read preliminary benchmarks. They stress that accurate predictions require careful consideration of architecture, memory, and the evolving landscape of GPU launches, while also poking fun at the sometimes chaotic early hype cycle surrounding new GPUs. The first major segment dives into the AMD RX Vega rumors, including leaked specifications and initial impressions of its design language. They discuss a possible gaming variant of Vega and consider the implications of the 1630 MHz core clock and the frontier edition’s feature set for gaming performance. The hosts compare Vega’s potential against Nvidia’s current lineup, pointing out that any gaming performance delta would need to be meaningful to shift the balance against the 1080 Ti. They acknowledge that Vega’s memory configuration,HBM2 with 8 GB and 484 square millimeters of die space,signals high-end ambitions but also raises questions about cost and power efficiency. The discussion then shifts toward how pricing and availability could influence competitiveness, noting that mining demand and memory bandwidth considerations will play significant roles in real-world value. Throughout, Linus and Luke offer nuanced caveats about synthetic benchmarks versus actual gaming results and stress the importance of real-world testing before drawing conclusions about performance leadership. A substantial portion centers on Ryzen market momentum, with coverage of Ryzen 5 1600 climbing to the #2 position on Amazon’s bestseller list. They discuss how AMD’s multi-core competitiveness is resonating with mainstream builders, particularly as Dell integrates AMD parts into consumer systems. The hosts reflect on how strong marketing and ecosystem partnerships can amplify a processor’s perceived value, even when benchmarks vary by workload. They also note that market share claims from industry analyses can be misleading if they're based on self-reported data, underscoring the need for cautious interpretation of market studies. The discussion touches on the broader context of Intel responses and the implications for pricing and supply dynamics in the CPU space. They frame the Ryzen success as evidence that AMD has momentum beyond OEMs and into consumer builds that rely on strong price-to-performance ratios. In another segment, the show reviews broader industry moves including Tesla’s battery ambitions in South Australia and Germany’s large-scale energy storage projects. They treat these stories as examples of how energy storage developments could influence technology ecosystems and infrastructure planning. The hosts juxtapose consumer hardware news with large-scale energy initiatives to illustrate the pace of innovation across sectors. While not deeply technical, the segment reinforces the show’s theme of following disruptive technologies that can alter how hardware is consumed and deployed. The conversations remain accessible, with quick takes and reactions rather than deep dives, providing viewers with a snapshot of cross-domain tech trends. They also weave in sponsor messages and light jokes to maintain the show’s energetic pacing without detracting from the news cadence. The program then returns to hardware discourse with a focused look at Vega die size and potential pricing strategies. They reference official statements about die area, using 484 mm^2 as a proxy for understanding production costs and target segments. The hosts explain why die size is meaningful for pricing power and potential yields, while noting that such figures alone do not determine performance or value. They discuss how architectural features, async compute, Vulcan and DirectX 12 performance in real games, and memory bandwidth will shape RX Vega’s competitive stance. The conversation emphasizes that a balanced approach to performance, power, and price will determine whether Vega can meaningfully challenge Nvidia’s lineup at launch. The hosts reiterate their cautious optimism, acknowledging both the potential upside and the uncertainties that lie ahead for AMD’s high-end GPU effort. A subsequent portion addresses the broader GPU ecosystem, including the impact of crypto-mining demand on GPU pricing and availability. They speculate about how mining trends may affect Vega’s price-to-performance proposition and discuss the likelihood that the market could react to supply constraints. The hosts acknowledge that mining can distort typical buy patterns for enthusiasts and gamers, potentially skewing early impressions of a product’s value. They also discuss the importance of supply stability for any new launch window to meet consumer expectations, suggesting that AMD may need to adjust pricing or supply strategies in response to demand dynamics. The tone remains analytical yet approachable, with emphasis on how these macro factors intersect with product design and go-to-market plans. Toward the midpoint, the WAN Show explores the importance of credible leaks and the role of third-party outlets in shaping perception ahead of official announcements. They critique the reliability of rumors and highlight how professionals in the industry weigh sources differently, stressing that not all leaks carry the same weight. The hosts use Vega as a case study to illustrate how early data can mislead fans, investors, and reviewers if not interpreted within the broader context of architecture, product tiers, and market strategy. Their discussion also covers what constitutes a competitive gaming card, including compute capabilities, memory bandwidth, driver maturity, and game-specific performance. The dialogue remains lively, with humor and ad-libbed asides that keep the technical content engaging for a mixed audience. As the show shifts into consumer impact, they analyze AMD’s apparent market momentum in CPUs and the implications for PC builders. The discussion reflects on how Ryzen’s performance and marketing synergies help expand AMD’s addressable market, including mainstream consumer segments and major OEM partnerships. Viewers get a sense of how product perception translates into actual purchasing behavior, with an emphasis on value beyond raw frame rates. The hosts also remark on the broader industry narrative, noting how marketing and engineering teams can collaborate to deliver compelling packages that resonate with buyers who may not be deeply versed in technical specs. The tone, again, blends pragmatic analysis with personal anecdotes about hardware investments and upgrade decisions. In closing, the show previews the next steps for AMD and Nvidia, referencing anticipated product cycles and the continuing evolution of GPU architectures. They acknowledge the uncertainty surrounding launch timelines and the need to see independent test results before forming definitive judgments about performance leadership. The hosts recap the main talking points: Vega’s die size, memory configuration, potential price points, and the essential distinction between professional and gaming variants. They also remind viewers of the ongoing sponsor integrations and tease upcoming content, including deeper dives into CPU and GPU markets and further discussion of tech industry dynamics. The WAN Show ends on a humorous note that maintains the show’s signature tone while keeping an eye on the tech horizon for more concrete data as it becomes available.
Topics · technology · hardware · gaming hardware · energy tech
Questions answered
- What is the expected core clock for RX Vega discussed in the WAN Show?
- The discussion notes a core clock around 1630 MHz for the RX Vega prototype discussed on the show.
- Why do the hosts caution about Vega's gaming performance relative to the 1080 Ti?
- Because even with a high memory bandwidth and a large die, the gaming performance delta needs to be meaningful to compete with Nvidia's established top-tier card, the 1080 Ti, given architectural and driver maturation factors.