SIDEMEN ANSWER THE INTERNETS STRANGEST QUESTIONS
0 up · 0 down · 0 ratings
Channels and socials
• Sidemen: youtube.com • Sidemen Clothing: sidemenclothing.com • Sidemen Twitter: twitter.com Sidemen: • Miniminter: youtube.com • Zerkaa: youtube.com • Behzinga: youtube.com • Vikkstar123: youtube.com • TBJZL: youtube.com • Wroetoshaw: youtube.com • KSI: youtube.com edited by Tegs: twitter.com
Sidemen: Answering the Internet's Strangest Questions is a humorous, border-puzzling Q&A-style video where the group tackles a series of taboo and absurd prompts sourced from the internet. The tone veers from playful bravado to genuine hesitation as the lads weigh moral lines, personal boundaries, and the limits of what they will reveal about themselves. Early on, the cast debates an extreme hypothetical that pits one sex tape against the survival of all members, revealing each person’s risk tolerance and party-line dynamic. As the questions escalate, topics shift from shocking admissions to grotesque hypotheticals about eating body parts, and even the idea of performing or witnessing acts on a microscopic scale in exchange for money. The conversation occasionally spirals into chaotic banter, with occasional moments of restraint from certain members adding balance to the overall energy. The end result is a chaotic, entertaining, and occasionally insightful window into how the Sidemen navigate sensitive topics while keeping the mood light and comedic.
Topics · comedy · internet culture · talk show · celebrity
Questions answered
- If you must release one Sidemen sex tape or all of you die, who would you choose to release and why?
- The group discusses choosing to release their own tape as the safer option, with members suggesting that exposing others would be too extreme while releasing themselves would be the more controlled decision.
- Which body part would you eat if stranded, and why would you choose that option?
- The conversation centers on eating a body part such as the thigh or calf, with debates about practicality, taste, and the amount of meat available if stranded, ultimately highlighting the absurdity of the scenario.
- Is there a price at which you would strangle or harm a puppy, and what would it mean for your ethics?
- They acknowledge a hypothetical price but treat it as an extreme moral line, with the consensus generally rejecting harm to animals even for money, reflecting a boundary multiple viewers would expect from them.