Entry № 041-3 / V-3708 · 0:00 synced

AMD RYZEN 5 AND 3 PERFORMANCE PREVIEW!

Linus Tech Tips@LinusTechTips723.1K viewsMar 20, 20179:13
Source
YT
Views
723.1K
Subscribers
16.8M
Critic
?
Audience
?

0 up · 0 down · 0 ratings

Description

What performance can you expect from AMD's upcoming Ryzen 5 and Ryzen 3 lineups? We simulated each and the results look pretty darn promising!

Check out Zotac’s EN10 Gaming Mini PC at geni.us Feenix Autore Backlit keyboard: geni.us Buy Ryzen 7 processors on Amazon: geni.us Discuss on the forum: linustechtips.com Our Affiliates, Referral Programs, and Sponsors: linustechtips.com

Channels and socials

Check out our Linus Tech Tips posters at crowdmade.com twitter.com @LinusTech Intro Screen Music Credit: Title: Laszlo - Supernova Video Link: youtube.com iTunes Download Link: itunes.apple.com Artist Link: soundcloud.com Outro Screen Music Credit: Approaching Nirvana - Sugar High youtube.com Sound effects provided by freesfx.co.uk

Start
AI OverviewDefault language

The video opens with Linus revealing an early look at Ryzen 5 and Ryzen 3, explaining that the team does not yet have the actual chips but will simulate performance by matching core counts and frequencies to AMD's announced specs. He outlines the testing methodology, including the replacement Asus Crosshair VI-based test bench and a GTX 1080 Ti GPU for synthetic benchmarks, to create a realistic performance picture across gaming and productivity workloads. The presenters discuss the limitations of their approach, noting that Precision Boost and extended frequency scaling are disabled for the simulations and that some frequencies are adjusted to represent a ballpark scenario rather than exact peak behavior. In gaming benchmarks at 1080p, Ryzen 5 and 3 series show a promising trend, with the 1600X and 1400X often outperforming similarly priced Intel counterparts in multi-threaded tasks while trading some single-threaded advantage in titles with heavier single-core requirements. The video then shifts to synthetic benchmarks like 3DMark and Cinebench, where Ryzen parts generally keep pace or exceed expectations against quad-core competition, emphasizing clock speed and thread parity as key drivers of performance per dollar. The presenters provide a nuanced take on the 1200X and 1400X results, noting potential overestimation due to disabled boost features and the caveat that real-world silicon and cooling will influence final outcomes. The discussion culminates with value-oriented conclusions: the Ryzen 5 and Ryzen 3 lineup appears to offer strong performance per dollar, especially for multi-threaded workloads, while real-world samples and overclocking data remain to be verified. The video closes by highlighting the small form factor Zotac Magnus PC as a tease for overall platform capabilities and inviting viewers to explore the video description links for sources, buy options, and community discussions, while encouraging likes and subscriptions for future content.

Topics · hardware · cpu · gaming · computing · technology

Questions answered

What is the core testing approach used for Ryzen 5 and Ryzen 3 in this video?
The video uses a methodology that matches Ryzen 5 and Ryzen 3 core counts and frequencies to AMD’s announced specs and runs simulations on a test bench with a GTX 1080 Ti to estimate performance across gaming and productivity scenarios.
Do the results reflect actual Ryzen chips at the time of publication?
No, the results are simulated, and frequencies are adjusted to represent a ballpark scenario. Real silicon behavior and boost dynamics may differ once actual Ryzen chips are available.