They Own Our Assets #Shorts @OwenJonesTalks
0 up · 0 down · 0 ratings
Description
The reason this country has had good living conditions in the last 50, 60, 70 years is because it has had a broad property owned and middle class. And if you allow wealth inequality to get out of control, you will lose that and you will lose your high living conditions. But if you tax wealthy people, they'll just leave the country, surely? Well, it didn't work for Roman Abramovich, did it? You know, I think one thing that we learned from the Ukraine war was suddenly the government decided we do want to tax rich people, just only rich people who are Russian. And then we realized, you know, these rich people, they're not magicians, right? I think we tend to imagine these guys like they've just got a massive bag full of money. These guys are rich because they own our assets. They own our houses. They own our mortgages. They own the skyscrapers. They own the shops, right? They own the land. When Roman Abramovich wanted to leave, he couldn't put Chelsea Football Club in a bag. Ultimately, the assets are here. We can tax the assets. it's a question about do you want your country to be owned by people who pay tax or who don't
The short argues that broad property ownership and a thriving middle class are what sustained good living conditions in recent decades, but warns that wealth inequality threatens this stability. It contends that the rich are not magicians, but rather wealthy because they own essential assets such as houses, mortgages, skyscrapers, shops, and land. The speaker emphasizes that when wealthy individuals leave or resist taxation, it is not simply a personal choice but a structural problem that affects national prosperity. A recurring point is that governments can tax assets directly, and that the crucial question is whether a country should be owned by those who pay taxes or by those who do not. The clip uses examples like Roman Abramovich to illustrate how asset ownership concentrates power and how policy decisions during events like the Ukraine conflict reveal selective taxation. The overarching message is that asset ownership underpins living standards, and robust taxation and public investment are necessary to protect a country’s social and economic fabric. The tone blends provocative assertion with a call to reconsider who ultimately controls national wealth, urging viewers to reflect on the balance between taxation, asset ownership, and the state’s role in providing public goods.
Topics · economics · politics · society · wealth-inequality