Entry № 041-3 / V-2802 · 0:00 synced

Let's talk about the Mac Stand... - WAN Show June 7, 2019

Linus Tech Tips@LinusTechTips471.4K viewsJun 8, 201956:06
Source
YT
Views
471.4K
Subscribers
16.8M
Critic
?
Audience
?

0 up · 0 down · 0 ratings

Description

Get $10 off your first booking on Rover at lmg.gg Monitor and manage your PC in real-time with Pulseway! Create your free account today at lmg.gg Get LTX 2019 Featuring DreamHack tickets NOW at dh.je Podcast Download: TBD Timestamps: TBD

Start
AI OverviewDefault language

The WAN Show episode from June 7, 2019 opens with the hosts establishing a lively, banter-filled tone as they set the stage for a deep dive into Mac hardware, WWDC takeaways, and a string of tech industry topics. They tease favorites from WWDC and acknowledge some topics were not all bad, while hinting at the dramatic updates and debates to come. The conversation quickly shifts to a broader tech-news mix, including blockchain chatter, crypto price talk, and a curious detour into the QuadrigaCX scandal, which frames the show as a wide-ranging tech discussion rather than a single product review. They also touch on content delays and YouTube dynamics, including the mechanics of super chats and how revenue is split with the platform, which grounds the show in the realities of streaming as a content creator. The hosts then pivot toward Apple’s WWDC focus, promising a balanced exploration of Mac Pro and related display technology while keeping a critical eye on price-to-value math. A substantial portion of the episode is devoted to the Mac Pro, with corrections to a prior video, clarifications about memory bandwidth, and a nuanced stance on ECC memory, six-channel memory, and Xeon W versus consumer-grade CPUs. They emphasize that higher memory bandwidth is valuable only if the workload justifies it, and they compare the Mac Pro to the iMac Pro as a reference point for performance-per-dollar and upgradeability. The discussion moves into the practical realities of product configuration, arguing that the Mac Pro’s base configuration looks heavily skewed toward a premium ego-driven market segment rather than a balanced workstation, and they propose that many buyers would be better served by alternative Apple options for real workloads. Throughout, the hosts insist that upgrade paths and long-term expansion matter, cautioning against throwaway hardware and suggesting ways third-party vendors might offer more economical upgrades. The show then transitions to a long-form dialogue about Apple’s display strategy, HDR standards, and how a future Apple monitor might fit into HDR10, HLG, and other established workflows, with predictions about Final Cut workflow enhancements around HDR content. The hosts experiment with the notion that the upcoming monitor could set new standards even as it navigates Bloom, local dimming, and the tradeoffs of OLED versus LCD backlighting. The segment on microLED and backlighting technologies expands the discussion to Nvidia, local-dimming breakthroughs, and the evolution from hundreds of zones to hundreds of micro-LEDs, while acknowledging that the exact form of consumer OLED-like performance remains a work in progress. The program balances technical depth with accessible humor, including a stand-by for sponsor segments, then returns to the practicalities of buying stands and accessories for premium displays, highlighting consumer expectations for bundles and included peripherals at higher price points. The episode closes with reflections on monitor stands, the perceived value of premium builds, and the broader lesson that luxury tech often sells on brand perception as much as on component specs, leaving viewers with a thoughtful take on how to evaluate high-end tech purchases against real-world needs and upgrade paths.

Topics · technology · consumer_electronics · hardware · business_strategy

Questions answered

What are the key factors behind the Mac Pro's high base price according to the WAN Show discussion?
The hosts argue the six-figure price point is driven by a premium case design, licensing tied to the motherboard, and a business model that targets ego buyers. They also suggest that the base configuration uses a relatively modest GPU and memory setup, relying on customers to upgrade later, which raises questions about value for money for serious workloads.
How do the hosts compare ECC memory in Xeon W to consumer CPUs for workstations?
They explain ECC memory provides error correction benefits, but testing and demonstrable proofs of its impact are hard to come by. They note that AMD also offers ECC across its lineup and that the perceived superiority of Xeon W for workstations does not always translate into clear, measurable gains for all workloads.