Entry № 041-8 / V-266 · 0:00 synced

The Dumbest Wearables Ever

Techquickie@techquickie218.3K viewsAug 16, 20224:29
Source
YT
Views
218.3K
Subscribers
4.3M
Critic
?
Audience
?

0 up · 0 down · 0 ratings

Promos

Try FreshBooks free, for 30 days, no credit card required at freshbooks.com Here are some of the dumbest wearables ever. Leave a reply with your requests for future episodes, or tweet them here: twitter.com ► GET MERCH: lttstore.com ► AFFILIATES, SPONSORS & REFERRALS: lmg.gg ► PODCAST GEAR: lmg.gg ► SUPPORT US ON FLOATPLANE: floatplane.com FOLLOW US ELSEWHERE --------------------------------------------------- Twitter: twitter.com Facebook: @LinusTech Instagram: @linustech TikTok: @linustech Twitch: twitch.tv

Start
AI OverviewDefault language

The video surveys a gallery of notably impractical wearables from the early era of consumer tech. It opens by recalling Google Glass as a commonly imagined example of a wearable misstep, then moves to the Poma by Zyber, a 2002 wearable PC that resembled something off a Star Trek set. The Poma ran Windows CE, boasted a 128 MHz CPU and 32 MB RAM, and tried to imitate a 13-inch monitor on the user’s face with a 800x600 display, but the experience was hampered by a display that obstructed vision and poor input methods, including an on-body keyboard and an external optical mouse. The segment highlights its $1,500 price tag and weak battery life as key factors in its commercial failure, illustrating how ambition outpaced practicality. Next, the video riffs on Beauty And The Geek, a 2012 concept that sewed a keyboard directly into pants, pairing convenience with social awkwardness, built-in speakers, and a wireless mouse, ultimately failing to reach mass market due to usability and public perception issues. The narrative then introduces a more practical but disappointing product, the Ring by Logbar, a gesture-based wearable ring intended to control devices with midair gestures, which raised over a million dollars on Kickstarter but performed poorly in real use, with gestures working only about 5% of the time and a bulky design that drew ridicule. Throughout, the host notes the gap between hype and reality in wearables, underscoring how early attempts often prioritized novelty over reliability, culminating in a lighthearted yet critical tour of gadgets that could have reshaped our interaction with technology if they had truly delivered. The piece also includes a sponsor segment and closes with a call for viewer input on future topics, inviting requests for even more ambitious or ridiculous wearable concepts to examine next.

Topics · technology · wearables · consumer_electronics · gadgets · technology_history

Questions answered

What was the Poma wearable and why did it fail in the market?
The Poma was a 2002 wearable PC from Zyber running Windows CE with a 128 MHz CPU and 32 MB RAM, designed to mimic a small monitor on the user’s eye. It failed due to an obstructive display, awkward input options (including a forearm keyboard), and poor battery life, all compounded by a steep $1,500 price tag.
Why did the Ring by Logbar become infamous as a wearable?
The Ring aimed to allow midair gesture control for devices, but its gestures reportedly worked only about 5% of the time, and its large ring design looked awkward. It sold for around $269 and became notorious for unreliability and impracticality.