Entry № 041-3 / V-6553 · 0:00 synced

Intel SSD 510 Series 120GB Crystal Disk Mark Performance on SATA2 SATA3 RAID0 Linus Tech Tips

Linus Tech Tips@LinusTechTips57K viewsMar 1, 20114:06
Source
YT
Views
57K
Subscribers
16.8M
Critic
?
Audience
?

0 up · 0 down · 0 ratings

Description

ncix.com Intel's SATA3 6.0Gb/s drives are here. This video is intended to give us a look at how they perform depending on the kind of controller they are connected to as well as how they perform in RAID0

Start
AI OverviewDefault language

The video presents a hands-on benchmark of the Intel SSD 510 Series 120GB across several controller and interface configurations to evaluate how SATA 2 and SATA 3, as well as RAID0, impact performance. Linus walks through testing with CrystalDiskMark, noting that results are synthetic and may not directly reflect real-world performance but provide useful comparisons. The setup includes a single SSD connected to SATA 3, a dual SSD RAID 0 configuration on the motherboard’s SATA 3 ports, and a comparison to a RAID card configuration using an LSI 9268 controller. The reviewer also mentions comparing against a RevoDrive X2 240GB for sequential and random workloads, highlighting how data patterns influence results. Key observations include that sequential reads benefit substantially from a wider data bus in RAID0, with speeds approaching 1 GB/s on the dual-drive onboard setup, while writes show more variation depending on controller and card efficiency. The discussion concludes by emphasizing workload dependence, noting that high-end RAID controllers and firmware updates may further improve performance for the Intel 510 Series, and invites viewers to consider their own workloads when choosing a configuration for OS and data storage.

Topics · technology · hardware · storage · performance

Questions answered

What configurations were tested in the Intel SSD 510 Series video?
The test configurations include a single Intel SSD 510 120GB on SATA 3, a dual SSD 510 RAID 0 on the motherboard's SATA 3 ports, and a comparison with an LSI 9268 RAID controller card. A RevoDrive X2 240GB was also tested for additional sequential and random workloads.
Why are CrystalDiskMark results not guaranteed to reflect real-world performance?
CrystalDiskMark is a synthetic benchmark that focuses on specific operations and data patterns, so results can differ from real-world usage. The video emphasizes that results are useful for comparing configurations but not definitive indicators of everyday performance.
What is a key takeaway about RAID configurations from the video?
Sequential reads benefit significantly from a wider data bus in RAID0 configurations, with onboard SATA 3 showing near 1 GB/s reads for dual drives, while writes are more influenced by controller efficiency and firmware.