Dear Intel New CEO Guy, KEEP MAKING THESE! - Battlemage for a Month Part 2
0 up · 0 down · 0 ratings
Promos
Visit squarespace.com and use offer code LTT for 10% off Thanks to SHARGE for sponsoring this video!
Check out their Shargeek 170 power bank below! SHARGE official website: bit.ly Amazon: amzn.to This challenge took a lot longer than a month because it turns out the B580 is a perfectly cromulent graphics card, provided you're pairing it with a capable CPU. After 30 days, David and Plouffe just sort of kept going, but did either of them keep the Intel Battlemage GPU? Discuss on the forum: linustechtips.com Buy an ASRock Intel ARC B580 Graphics Card: geni.us ► GET OUR MERCH: lttstore.com ► GET EXCLUSIVE CONTENT ON FLOATPLANE: lmg.gg ► GET A VPN: piavpn.com ► SPONSORS, AFFILIATES, AND PARTNERS: lmg.gg Purchases made through some store links may provide some compensation to Linus Media Group. CHAPTERS --------------------------------------------------- 0:00 Intro 1:27 What Went Well 4:40 What Went Poorly 10:15 Challenge Results 13:50 Conclusion 17:12 Outro
The video follows Linus and team continuing the Battlemage for a Month challenge, focusing on the Intel Arc B580 graphics card. The hosts reflect on a full month of usage, comparing the B580 to higher end GPUs like the RTX 3090 and 4090, and to prior Arc experiments. They discuss how the B580 performs in real gaming scenarios, noting that 4K native performance isn’t essential for a smooth experience when using upscaling and sensible settings. The segment highlights both positives, such as surprisingly solid stability, good upscaling with XSS, and the general gaming experience at 4K with lowered settings, and negatives like stability issues, occasional crashes, and streaming limitations. The hosts also share personal anecdotes about upgrading their own rigs, selling off previous cards, and evaluating the broader GPU market and price trends. A key theme is shifting focus from peak technical graphics to enjoyable gameplay, and recognizing value in a midrange card when paired with a capable CPU. The discussion extends into broader reflections on hardware marketing hype, consumer expectations, and the balance between price, performance, and longevity. Finally, the video includes sponsor mentions and a tease of future updates, underscoring the ongoing curiosity about Intel’s Battlemage roadmap and related desktop GPUs. The overall takeaway is that the B580 can be a compelling 4K-capable option for many players, provided users adjust expectations and workflows accordingly, while also acknowledging current platform challenges and the evolving GPU landscape.
Topics · technology · hardware review · gaming · graphics processing
Questions answered
- What were the main positives observed with the Arc B580 after 30 days of use?
- The B580 delivered solid gameplay in many AAA titles when paired with a capable CPU, with stable performance, effective upscaling, and acceptable visuals at lower to medium settings for 4K displays.
- What were the major drawbacks noted during the Battlemage for a Month test?
- The most prominent issues were stability and crashes, especially on one machine, plus some streaming and capture limitations and occasional texture and pop-in quirks, which affected immersion for some games.
- Did the B580 enable true 4K native gaming, according to the video?
- No, native 4K was generally not required; with 4K displays, users could compensate with upscaling and lower settings to maintain smooth gameplay.
- What is the broader takeaway about buying GPUs in this context?
- The discussion emphasizes balancing price, performance, and longevity, arguing that a midrange card can offer excellent value if you manage expectations and avoid chasing peak graphical fidelity at all costs.