I Have 2 Weeks to File a Dispute for this Scam TV
0 up · 0 down · 0 ratings
Promos
Visit squarespace.com and use offer code LTT for 10% off Limited time offer: 20% off Acronis Cyber Protect and Acronis Snap Deploy at go.acronis.com The 150" and 100" TVs we ordered from AliExpress finally showed up. Surprise surprise, they're not quite what we ordered. Come check them out. Discuss on the forum: linustechtips.com ► GET OUR MERCH: lttstore.com ► GET EXCLUSIVE CONTENT ON FLOATPLANE: lmg.gg ► GET A VPN: piavpn.com ► SPONSORS, AFFILIATES, AND PARTNERS: lmg.gg Purchases made through some store links may provide some compensation to Linus Media Group. CHAPTERS --------------------------------------------------- 0:00 Intro 1:40 Unboxing 5:50 Attaching Feet 7:45 IO 8:20 Accessories 10:25 Turning It On 12:39 Settings 15:10 Crab Rave 17:15 HDR 18:50 PC Gaming 22:40 Marketing 25:22 Outro
This video documents an unboxing and hands-on evaluation of a so-called 150 inch TV and a 100 inch TV ordered from AliExpress that turn out to be not what was advertised. The hosts begin by questioning the measurements, discussing the discrepancy between inches and centimeters and joking about Chinese inches, setting up the central tension: the large sizes promised may not match what arrived. They proceed to unbox, inspect the packaging, and confirm the boxes vary between units, suggesting a lack of consistency between sellers or even different manufacturers. Throughout the segment they repeatedly highlight potential red flags like mismatched branding, questionable warranty details, and the presence of subpar components, hinting at a scam-like situation. The team then investigates the external markings, identifies the Android-like and Windows-like logos, and ponders whether the device might be a knockoff or a low-cost OEM panel rather than a legitimate Samsung/TCL display. By examining connectors, inputs, and the screen, they assess form factor, mounting options, and build quality, revealing a front-heavy, poorly finished chassis with questionable reliability. The discussion shifts to test results, where picture quality varies wildly depending on the app used, with HDR struggling to deliver true contrast and color accuracy, and the panel showing evident dirty screen effects and motion blur at close viewing distances. The hosts run a battery of practical tests including brightness, color accuracy, and 4K/60 Hz capability, while noting the absence of expected features like robust local dimming, strong color fidelity, and reliable HDR. They also explore the TV’s software surface, discovering odd app availability and region-lock quirks, and speculate on the possibility the OS is an Android-derived layer rather than a genuine branded experience. Finally, they discuss the implications of having wasted thousands of dollars on a product that was advertised as a premium giant TV, the potential for dispute filing, and the possible outcomes, including compensation or returns, while peppering the evaluation with lighthearted moments and humor to temper the frustration. The video closes with a candid reflection on the experience, a reminder that the consumer should approach bulk-sized electronics with skepticism, and a suggestion that viewers compare such purchases against reputable brands and retailers for future reference.
Topics · technology · consumer electronics · unboxing · reviews · scams and fraud · online shopping risk · televisions
Questions answered
- What size were the TVs supposed to be and what did the team actually receive?
- The team was promised 150 inch and 100 inch TVs from AliExpress, but measurements and visuals indicate the actual sizes did not match those advertised, with the 100 inch appearing closer to 65 inches in practice.
- What branding or logos did they find on the TVs, and what did that imply?
- They found Android and Windows logos, and suspected that the branding might be generic or counterfeit, with some branding resembling TCL or Samsung phonetics, suggesting possible mislabeling or counterfeit components.
- Did the TVs perform as expected in HDR and 4K gaming tests?
- HDR performance was inconsistent and often poor, with 4K at 60 Hz achievable in some tests but lacking true contrast and good local dimming, indicating a subpar panel and processing stack.
- What software environment did the device run, and what issues did they observe?
- The device appeared to run a mixed or counterfeit software surface with apps like YouTube and Netflix present but not functioning consistently, and region/app availability varied, implying a compromised or generic OS build.
- What was the recommended course of action for viewers who bought these TVs?
- The hosts recommended disputing the purchase and seeking compensation, noting the difficulty of returns and the risk of further delays if they cancel or pursue the dispute, while advising to compare with reputable brands for future purchases.