The Hunt for the BEST Controller (Hall Effect)
0 up · 0 down · 0 ratings
Promos
Go to sponsr.is and use code LTT to get 25% off your first month or year of boot.dev. Take your coding skills to the next level and learn backend developing with boot.dev today! This is the ULTIMATE showdown of game controllers that we missed in our last video; we’ve got over 20 remotes and we’re trying to find which is THE BEST! What has the lowest input latency? Which has key features like Hall Effect Sticks and Triggers? Which feels comfiest? Which is the best for the budget? We’re covering it all, and including a handy tier list. Discuss on the forum: linustechtips.com
Check out the controllers in the lineup (in alphabetical order): 8BitDo Ultimate 2C: geni.us Candy Con: geni.us EasySMX X05: geni.us EasySMX X10: geni.us EasySMX X20: geni.us Flydigi Apex 4: geni.us Flydigi Direwolf 3: lmg.gg Flydigi Vader 4 Pro: geni.us GameSir G7 HE: geni.us GameSir Nova Lite: geni.us Guilikit KK3 MAX: geni.us Machenike G5 Pro: geni.us NYXI Master P1: geni.us PDP Victrix Pro BFG: geni.us Power A OPS V1: geni.us Razer Wolverine V3 Pro: geni.us Turtle Beach Stealth Ultra: geni.us Purchases made through some store links may provide some compensation to Linus Media Group. ► GET OUR MERCH: lttstore.com ► GET EXCLUSIVE CONTENT ON FLOATPLANE: lmg.gg ► GET A VPN: piavpn.com ► SPONSORS, AFFILIATES, AND PARTNERS: lmg.gg Purchases made through some store links may provide some compensation to Linus Media Group. CHAPTERS --------------------------------------------------- 0:00 What are we doing here? 1:07 The Pre-Tournament Luxury Eliminations 4:30 Round 1 - All Round Experience 10:27 Input Latency Charts 10:37 Round 1 Continues 15:10 - Round 2 - Sticks and Triggers 18:52 - The Semi-Finals - Precision and D-pad 20:15 The Loser Final 21:02 The Final Finals - All Round Experience… Again 21:50 AND THE WINNER IS… 22:50 David’s Adjusted Tier List
The Hunt for the BEST Controller (Hall Effect) dives into an ambitious tournament format to crown the ultimate game controller based on a wide range of criteria. The hosts kick off with a concept they’ve never tried before, a single elimination bracket that pits more than 20 controllers against each other and spans price points from budget to premium. They emphasize that popularity does not equal quality, and they set up an event where latency, hall effect sticks, trigger mechanics, comfort, and overall value will be weighed across rounds. The video frames the competition with a mix of on-hands testing and live commentary, highlighting each controller’s distinctive traits such as removable faceplates, adjustable stick tension, and ringed trigger stops. Viewers are guided through the bracket progression as the contenders are whittled down through rounds that test precision, feel, and consistency across different gameplay scenarios. The hosts stress testing methodology, including wired versus wireless latency, circularity of sticks, and the practicalities of real world use, to decide which controller earns a place in the finals and which must bow out early. They also tease the eventual winner and promise a tier list that encapsulates value, performance, and ergonomic comfort across the lineup. The video then pivots to detailed round-by-round analysis, comparing top contenders against mid-range options and highlighting how small mechanical differences translate into meaningful in-game advantages. Overall, the episode is both a practical buyer’s guide and an entertaining lab-style experiment that aims to demystify what makes a controller truly feel premium versus simply feature rich. The concluding moments focus on consolidating the findings into a final tier ranking, while acknowledging subjective preferences and the idea that different players may prioritize different aspects such as feel, weight, or trigger responsiveness. The editors wrap with a call to explore more controller testing content, suggesting this is just the start of a broader lab-style exploration of peripherals in the LTT ecosystem.
Topics · technology · gaming hardware · product testing · consumer electronics · reviews · laboratory testing
Questions answered
- What was the overall goal of The Hunt for the BEST Controller (Hall Effect) video?
- The goal was to determine the best controller among a large lineup by testing for latency, hall effect capability, comfort, and value through a knockout bracket and tier list.
- Which controller won the final verdict and why?
- The ultimate winner was the Easy SMX X20, praised for its strong value, overall performance, and good input characteristics at a mid-range price.
- Did the video test both wired and wireless variants?
- Yes, the video compared both wired and wireless configurations to assess latency and consistency across setups.
- How did they handle the pricing aspect in the competition?
- The hosts included controllers across a price range and noted when cheaper options performed very well relative to more expensive ones, emphasizing value-based decisions.
- Were viewers encouraged to explore more peripheral content after this video?
- Yes, the hosts suggested exploring additional controller testing videos and related peripherals to broaden the understanding of gaming inputs.