Entry № 041-2 / V-189 · 0:00 synced

The Worst Product I've Ever Reviewed... For Now

Marques Brownlee@mkbhd9.4M viewsApr 14, 202425:03
Source
YT
Views
9.4M
Subscribers
21M
Critic
?
Audience
?

0 up · 0 down · 0 ratings

Promos

The Humane AI pin is... bad. Almost no one should buy it. Yet. MKBHD Merch: shop.mkbhd.com Tech I'm using right now: amazon.com Intro music: youtube.com Playlist of MKBHD Intro music: goo.gl Pin provided by pin for review. ~ twitter.com @MKBHD @MKBHD 0:00 What Is it? 2:30 The Hardware 4:26 What Does It Do? 8:14 The Review (It's Bad) 15:00 Smartphones are OP 21:20 A Victim of Its Future Ambition

Start
AI OverviewDefault language

The video opens by introducing the Humane AI Pin as a novel wearable computer that operates as a standalone device with its own internet connection and phone number. The host foregrounds the device’s ambitious design and spec sheet, noting a premium build with an aluminum chassis, multiple color options, and a robust set of sensors including a camera, microphone, lights, a laser projector, and a touch pad. He emphasizes that the device is meant to function without pairing to a smartphone, relying on its own data plan and cloud processing for most tasks. The initial framing also highlights a hefty price tag of $700 plus a $24 per month data subscription, immediately signaling that the product will be scrutinized for value versus convenience. Throughout the hardware overview, he praises the craftsmanship and the cleverness of features like hot-swapping boosters, a reflective charging case, and a desktop puck for charging multiple components simultaneously. He then pivots to a conceptual walkthrough, explaining how the pin can respond to voice queries, perform translations, show visual data via a palm-projected UI, and remember user preferences through a Humane Center web portal. The evaluation shifts toward practical usage, noting that the device can perform tasks such as making calls, sending texts, translating languages, and scanning the environment, but often requires cloud-based processing which introduces latency and potential inaccuracies. The host critically dissects the user experience, pointing out that most functions rely on internet connectivity and that responses can be slow, incorrect, or contextually off, sometimes due to server timeouts or misinterpretations. He underscores a core friction: while the concept is compelling, the pin frequently underdelivers on important tasks, and even basic actions like sending a photo or accessing apps are clunkier than simply using a phone. The reviewer provides concrete examples of failures, such as incorrect factual answers, slow response times, and a lack of third-party apps, which collectively erode the device’s practicality in daily life. He argues that the device’s standalone design creates a persistent gap compared to a smartphone, especially since the pin cannot reach into common apps or services and cannot easily integrate with existing workflows. The video culminates in a frank verdict: the Humane AI Pin currently embodies a bold but flawed execution that is not ready for everyday use, with the future promise of improvements not justifying the present cost and friction. He closes with a nuanced acknowledgement that while the concept is worth respecting and the roadmap has potential, the current product is best avoided by all but the most enthusiasts who are willing to tolerate significant trade-offs for a slimmer, screen-free form factor and a taste of what a more mature version could become.

Topics · technology · consumer electronics · wearables · ai