These Ray-Bans Look Great BUT... - Facebook Stories Sunglasses
0 up · 0 down · 0 ratings
Promos
Get $25 off all pairs of Vessi Footwear with offer code shortcircuit at vessi.com Ray-Ban Sunglasses are pretty great as they make you look good, but what happens if you link them to your Facebook account? Does it make you a bit creepy? Buy Facebook Rayban Glasses (maybe not?) On Best Buy (Paid Link): geni.us Buy An Ugly Truth: Inside Facebook's Battle for Domination On Amazon (Paid Link): geni.us Purchases made through some store links may provide some compensation to Linus Media Group. ►GET MERCH: lttstore.com ►SUPPORT US ON FLOATPLANE: floatplane.com ►LTX EXPO: ltxexpo.com AFFILIATES & REFERRALS --------------------------------------------------- ►Affiliates, Sponsors & Referrals: lmg.gg ►Check out our podcast gear: kit.co ►Private Internet Access VPN: lmg.gg ►Our Official Charging Partner Anker: lmg.gg ►Secretlabs Gaming Chairs: lmg.gg ►MK Keyboards: lmg.gg ►Nerd or Die Stream Overlays: lmg.gg ►Green Man Gaming lmg.gg ►Amazon Prime: lmg.gg ►Audible Free Trial: lmg.gg ►Our Gear on Amazon: lmg.gg FOLLOW US ELSEWHERE --------------------------------------------------- Twitter: twitter.com Instagram: @shortcircuityt Facebook: @ShortCircuitYT FOLLOW OUR OTHER CHANNELS --------------------------------------------------- Linus Tech Tips: lmg.gg TechLinked: lmg.gg Mac Address: lmg.gg Techquickie: lmg.gg LMG Clips: lmg.gg Channel Super Fun: lmg.gg Carpool Critics: lmg.gg
The video opens with a playful, music-filled intro for Facebook Stories sunglasses, then immediately shifts to unboxing and first impressions. The hosts discuss two styles of Ray-Ban stories, noting the heavier, magnetized charging case and the overall plastic build. They comment on the price, mentioning around $300, and compare the look to traditional Wayfarers, suggesting the rounds might be riskier in terms of appearance. The packaging is shown in detail, including the USB-C charger, a soft bag, and a warranty sleeve, while they joke about the box’s magnets and waste. Throughout this first segment, the emphasis is on design, packaging, and initial usability, including the setup steps like downloading the Facebook View app and pairing the glasses to a phone. In the middle section, the hosts dive into real-world usage, highlighting the glasses’ hands-free potential and the included light indicators. They test voice activation with “Hey Facebook” and demonstrate capturing photos and videos, noting the white LED indicators and the audio feedback when recording. They reflect on the device’s durability and comfort, commenting on thick arms and limited articulation of the nose piece, while also acknowledging that appearance is still that of ordinary sunglasses rather than a futuristic gadget. The discussion shifts to practical scenarios such as cycling or outdoor activities, where hands-free operation could be beneficial, but concerns about privacy and creepiness surface. They also cover the Android/iOS app experience, camera controls, motion blur, and how captures transfer to the phone, leaning into the trade-offs between convenience and data sharing. Later, the hosts test media playback, music streaming, and call quality using the built-in speakers, noting that audio comes from a tiny speaker array rather than through the glasses themselves. They experiment with different music services and podcast playback, finding that some apps route audio to the phone instead of the glasses, which presents a usability inconsistency. The review covers battery life projections, noting three charges in the case and an estimated six-hour use that may vary with heavy activity. They discuss the overall value proposition, concluding that while the sunglasses look like normal eyewear, the price is high and the feature set is not compelling for most users. The final take is skeptical: the product seems more like an experimental foray by Facebook than a must-buy consumer gadget, with broad limitations for everyday wearers and potential privacy concerns front and center. The closing remarks emphasize that these Ray-Ban stories feel like a proof of concept for future wearable tech rather than a finished, universally desirable product. The hosts acknowledge niche use cases such as sports or hands-free scenarios, but argue that for most people the device does not deliver enough practical benefit to justify the cost. They speculate about the broader strategy behind integrating social media with consumer hardware and express a hope for better privacy protections and more cohesive software experiences in future iterations. The video ends with a mix of humor about the absurdities of data collection and a critical but hopeful message that better, more responsible wearables could emerge from tech giants if the right design, regulation, and support align.
Topics · technology · consumer electronics · privacy · social media · wearables
Questions answered
- What are the two Ray-Ban stories styles mentioned, and which one is considered safer in appearance?
- The two styles are Wayfarer-like and round club shapes. The round styles are considered riskier in appearance, while the Wayfarer-like design is deemed safer and more universally flattering.
- Can the sunglasses be used as standalone audio devices, and how is audio delivered?
- Yes, they have built-in speakers for hands-free audio, but the sound comes from tiny speakers near the ears rather than the glasses themselves.
- What is a major concern discussed about the product’s data sharing and app requirements?
- A major concern is the extensive data access and location sharing required by the Facebook View app and the device, which raises privacy worries for users.
- Do the reviewers believe the product is a good buy for most people?
- No, they conclude that the price is high and the feature set is not compelling for most users, viewing it as an experimental concept rather than a mainstream product.