Apple v. Epic Games: Nobody Won
0 up · 0 down · 0 ratings
Promos
Get 20% OFF + Free Shipping @Manscaped at → manscaped.com ► LISTEN TO THE TECH NEWS: lmg.gg ►GET MERCH: lttstore.com ►SUPPORT US ON FLOATPLANE: floatplane.com ►LTX EXPO: ltxexpo.com NEWS SOURCES: lmg.gg --------------------------------------------------- Timestamps: 0:00 Help the world, etc 0:10 Apple v. Epic ruling 1:50 Facebook smart glasses 2:51 Facebook can see Whatsapp 3:47 MANSCAPED 4:18 QUICK BITS 4:25 Amazon free tuition 4:45 Free Luna trial for Prime members 5:18 Australian surveillance bill 5:41 Texas social media deplatforming law 6:09 Sony Playstation Showcase AFFILIATES & REFERRALS --------------------------------------------------- ►Affiliates, Sponsors & Referrals: lmg.gg ►Private Internet Access VPN: lmg.gg ►MK Keyboards: lmg.gg ►Nerd or Die Stream Overlays: lmg.gg ►Official Game Store: nexus.gg ►Amazon Prime: lmg.gg ►Audible Free Trial: lmg.gg ►Our Gear on Amazon: geni.us FOLLOW US ELSEWHERE --------------------------------------------------- Twitter: twitter.com Instagram: @TechLinkedYT Facebook: @TechLinked FOLLOW OUR OTHER CHANNELS --------------------------------------------------- Linus Tech Tips: lmg.gg Mac Address: youtube.com Techquickie: lmg.gg ShortCircuit: lmg.gg LMG Clips: lmg.gg Channel Super Fun: lmg.gg Carpool Critics: lmg.gg
The video covers the Apple v Epic Games ruling and what it means for app store economics and third-party payments on iOS. It explains that the judge found Epic did not prove Apple was a monopolist and that Epic breached its contract, resulting in Epic owing Apple a percentage of revenue from direct payments in Fortnite on iOS. The host then notes that Apple was found to violate California unfair competition law by allowing developers to link to third-party payment options, which could lead to changes within 90 days enabling alternative payment methods, though the practical details of what constitutes a usable button or link remain unclear. The segment also touches on Epic’s plans to appeal and the ongoing nature of the dispute, emphasizing that the ruling does not deliver a final, sweeping win for Epic despite some judges' findings. Beyond the court case, the video surveys other tech news items such as Facebook’s Ray-Ban Stories smart glasses, a ProPublica report on WhatsApp data handling, and quick takes on various tech policy developments in Australia and the United States. It also highlights upcoming entertainment news from a Sony PlayStation showcase, including trailers for Spider-Man 2, a Wolverine game, and other major releases, while keeping an eye on streaming and cloud gaming developments with Luna. The hosts deliver a fast-paced, humor-laced delivery style, blending legal nuance with light commentary and popular culture references, and close with a teaser for more updates in future episodes.
Topics · technology news · law and policy · consumer electronics · video games · entertainment news
Questions answered
- What was the core outcome of the Apple v Epic ruling for Epic and for Apple?
- The court found Epic did not prove Apple was a monopoly, Epic breached its contract, and Epic owes Apple a portion of revenue from direct Fortnite payments on iOS.
- What change did the ruling require Apple to make within 90 days?
- Apple must allow apps to include buttons or links to third-party payment mechanisms, enabling alternative payment options, though exact implementation details remaining unclear.