Intel is back on their bullsh**

The video delves into a controversial Intel marketing slide that accuses AMD of selling snake oil, highlighting perceived hypocrisy in branding and benchmark practices. It notes that the slide portrays AMD as untrustworthy through imagery and frames four core points to help consumers see through supposed competitor witchcraft: that current Ryzen processors secretly use AMD’s 2019 architecture, that Intel’s own products are built on the newer 13th gen design, and a nod to Intel’s long-running architecture evolutions since 2015. The host contextualizes these claims by referencing coverage from Tom’s Hardware and Jeremy LeRoux, acknowledging that while some of Intel’s criticisms have grains of truth, selective benchmarking and cherry-picking undermine the messaging. The discussion also touches on AMD’s counter-move with the Ryzen 8040 laptop chips, which the hosts describe as similar to last year’s 70/40 series but with higher clocks and refinements, suggesting that AMD’s naming conventions can contribute to consumer confusion. Beyond the Intel vs AMD debate, the video expands to Google Gemini, describing it as multimodal, trained on images, text, and video, and released in multiple variants, with Gemini Pro powering Bard and slated for broader availability in 2024. Later segments cover Twitch exiting South Korea due to high operational costs, the complexities of South Korean network fees under the Sending Party Network, and the potential impact on creators migrating to alternative platforms, framing these developments as indicative of broader challenges in global tech ecosystems. The host also wades into quick bits about iMessage on Android via Beeper Mini, iOS and Android messaging interoperability, and ongoing age-verification debates in the UK, tying together themes of platform strategy, regulatory pressure, and user experience across the tech landscape.

Topics · technology · hardware · tech news · industry analysis · consumer electronics