Dumb name, good product - Nothing Ear (a)
0 up · 0 down · 0 ratings
Promos
Go buy stuff dbrand stuff at shortlinus.com In 2021 Nothing released their Ear (1) earbuds, and 3 years later, we now have the Nothing Ear earbuds... Okay, so the naming doesn't make sense, but with a great design, solid performance, and an accessible price tag, the Nothing Ear and Ear (a) wireless earbuds seem to be a great option, but will Linus be willing to leave his AirPod Pros behind? More headphones.com test results: linustechtips.com Buy a pair of Nothing Ear (a) Buds: tidd.ly Buy a pair of Nothing Ear Buds: tidd.ly Buy a Nothing Phone (2): tidd.ly Purchases made through some store links may provide some compensation to Linus Media Group. Want us to unbox something? Make a suggestion at lmg.gg ► GET MERCH: lttstore.com ► GET EXCLUSIVE CONTENT ON FLOATPLANE: lmg.gg ► SPONSORS, AFFILIATES, AND PARTNERS: lmg.gg ► PRODUCTS WE USE ON THE SHORTCIRCUIT SET: lmg.gg FOLLOW US ELSEWHERE --------------------------------------------------- Twitter: twitter.com Instagram: @shortcircuityt TikTok: @linustech Facebook: @ShortCircuitYT CHAPTERS --------------------------------------------------- 0:00 Confusion naming convention... 0:25 Included accessories and pricing 0:54 Differences between Ear and Ear (a) 4:12 Trying the Ear (a) 6:16 Sponsor - dbrand 7:07 Messing with Bell(?) 7:31 Ear (a) listening impressions 9:06 ChatGPT integration and Ear listening impressions 9:46 Overall thoughts 10:03 Outro
The video opens by addressing the confusing naming scheme around Nothing Ear products, acknowledging that the names can be hard to follow and may even hinder brand perception. The host walks through the included accessories, pricing, and the general positioning of the Ear and Ear (a) models, noting both the similarities and the key price difference that invites closer examination. He then dives into hardware distinctions, like materials, drivers, water resistance ratings, and case design, comparing the Ear (a) to the Ear and highlighting how these choices affect sound clarity and bass emphasis. Throughout this segment, the reviewer references external testing and measurements, including a frequency response chart from headphones.com, to ground subjective impressions in data and lab observations. The discussion then shifts to day-to-day usage, including pairing, charging options, and the ability to tune sound via the Nothing X app, emphasizing how software tools can offset some of the hardware’s bass-forward reputation. In the latter portion, the host teases additional features such as an optional ChatGPT integration and notes the presence of a sponsored segment with dbrand, before wrapping with a balanced take on value and final recommendations for potential buyers.
Topics · technology · audio · consumer_electronics · unboxing · reviews
Questions answered
- What are the main differences between the Ear and Ear (a) models in terms of build and features?
- The Ear (a) uses a lighter, more affordable design with standard drivers, while Ear adds a higher-end ceramic driver setup, a more premium case, IP rating improvements, and additional tuning options via the Nothing X app.
- How does the active noise cancellation compare to competitors like AirPods Pro?
- The ANC is described as good but not on par with AirPods Pro; it balances performance with battery life and is enhanced by fit tests and adaptive modes.
- Is there any special software or AI feature integrated with the Ear (a)?
- Yes, there is a Nothing X app for EQ tuning, and some variants offer a preconfigured ChatGPT integration for voice assistant controls.