Why Our Video Got Taken Down
0 up · 0 down · 0 ratings
Promos
Use code fuckyoutube for 10% off all dbrand products at blondlinus.com Thanks to dbrand for sponsoring this video. The above offer is active until Monday, Sep 9th, 2024. Part 2 of what was supposed to be a three part series was taken down for violating YouTube’s terms of service. Here’s what I have to say about it. Subscribe to Floatplane for exclusive content: lmg.gg Discuss on the forum: linustechtips.com ► GET OUR MERCH: lttstore.com ► GET EXCLUSIVE CONTENT ON FLOATPLANE: lmg.gg ► GET A VPN: piavpn.com ► SPONSORS, AFFILIATES, AND PARTNERS: lmg.gg CHAPTERS --------------------------------------------------- 0:00 Intro 1:22 What Happened? 3:15 A Tech Tip! 3:32 What Happens to the Video? 4:44 Wait...They're Right? 5:55 So, What Did We Do? 7:58 Outro
Paragraph 1: The video opens with Linus explaining a rare event in their 15-year history,the removal of one of their videos by YouTube. He details the sequence: De-Google Your Life Part 2 was published, gained substantial traction with over a million views, and then was pulled after a YouTube guidelines warning. He questions what specific content could be considered harmful or dangerous, noting that other topics like ad blocking and VPNs have appeared on their channel without issue. He references an explainer from YouTube about harmful content tied to instructive material that enables unauthorized downloading, and he argues that the line of harm here is unclear while pointing out the video attempted to address how to access YouTube content without directly using the platform. He also foreshadows the discussion about how this situation illustrates the tension between platform rules and creator autonomy, including the potential consequences of repetitive violations. Paragraph 2: The second segment delves into concrete examples from the removed video, including a controversial open-map and ad-blocking discussion, and the decision not to re-upload or link to re-uploads to avoid further violations. Linus shares a single ad-free trick he found, while stressing that re-sharing the original content would violate TOS again and risk a channel strike. He compares the policy risk to real-world costs, such as the potential damage from a three-strikes rule and the impact on a large staff. The narrative then pivots to a broader strategic shift: to mitigate platform dependency, the team promotes Floatplane for exclusive content, while acknowledging the continued presence of YouTube uploads but with caution around third-party tools. He emphasizes a move toward diversifying revenue and distribution, mentions other creators who have sought alternatives, and hints at upcoming content that explores Windows activation economics, tying sponsorships from dbrand into a broader message about reducing dependence on Google and big tech. The conclusions highlight a cautious optimism about future content strategy, urging viewers to subscribe to Floatplane for ad-free access, and finishing with a call to support the channel through sponsorships and alternative platforms.
Topics · technology · online_policy · video_platforms
Questions answered
- What caused the video De-Google Your Life Part 2 to be taken down by YouTube?
- The video was removed for allegedly violating YouTube's Terms of Service by providing instructions on accessing YouTube content without using YouTube, which YouTube categorized as harmful or dangerous content.
- What changes did the creators make after the takedown?
- They avoided re-uploading the video on YouTube, promoted Floatplane for exclusive content, and signaled a move toward diversifying distribution and sponsorship-supported content while remaining cautious about future YouTube uploads.