Here's How to Save $45,000 - The Sensible Jellyfish Fryer
0 up · 0 down · 0 ratings
Promos
Thanks to Pulseway for sponsoring this project! Try Pulseway for free and remotely monitor and manage your server or PC at geni.us Back in 2019 we challenged ourselves to build an all-flash version of Lumaforge's Jellyfish hard drive-based video editing server for the SAME price. We succeed, but we've always wondered, what if we went for feature and hardware parity, how much could be saved? The answer might shock you. Discuss on the forum: linustechtips.com ► GET MERCH: lttstore.com ► AFFILIATES, SPONSORS & REFERRALS: lmg.gg ► PODCAST GEAR: lmg.gg ► SUPPORT US ON FLOATPLANE: floatplane.com FOLLOW US ELSEWHERE --------------------------------------------------- Twitter: twitter.com Facebook: @LinusTech Instagram: @linustech TikTok: @linustech Twitch: twitch.tv MUSIC CREDIT --------------------------------------------------- Intro: Laszlo - Supernova Video Link: youtube.com iTunes Download Link: itunes.apple.com Artist Link: soundcloud.com Outro: Approaching Nirvana - Sugar High Video Link: youtube.com Listen on Spotify: spoti.fi Artist Link: youtube.com Intro animation by MBarek Abdelwassaa @mbarek_abdel Monitor And Keyboard by vadimmihalkevich / CC BY 4.0 geni.us Mechanical RGB Keyboard by BigBrotherECE / CC BY 4.0 geni.us Mouse Gamer free Model By Oscar Creativo / CC BY 4.0 geni.us
The video presents a detailed build and cost analysis aimed at beating a commercial Jellyfish storage solution by using off-the-shelf components and a TrueNAS Core setup. The host explains that by switching from traditional hard drives to solid-state drives and choosing a different software stack, the project can achieve similar or better performance at roughly one fifth of the price. They walk through the hardware choices, including the iStarUSA chassis, AMD EPYC processor, ASRock Rack motherboard, dual 10 gigabit NICs, and a LSI 9305-6i HBA, while also considering storage topology like RAID-Z2 with 10-drive groups. The talk then shifts to software decisions, noting the use of TrueNAS Core instead of Lumaforge's Jellyfish Linux-based system, and how ZFS features such as ARC and level 2 ARC caching can impact performance for large media projects. Finally, the video covers networking, direct attach configurations, and remote management tool options, highlighting Pulseway for monitoring and management and contrasting the total cost against the original Jellyfish solution to emphasize substantial potential savings. The host also underscores practical tradeoffs, such as potential compromises in ease of use, and suggests that a skilled IT professional could replicate or improve the setup more cost-effectively than purchasing a pre-built Jellyfish, while keeping the system ready for long-term use as a backup server for high-demand workflows. The overarching conclusion is that a carefully chosen, self-built storage server can offer similar or superior capabilities at a fraction of the price, with flexible hardware choices and scalable performance for media editing pipelines. The video invites viewers to compare, discuss, and consider similar cost-saving approaches for professional storage needs and workflow optimization.
Topics · technology · data_storage · hardware · networking · cloud_and_server_management · media_production
Questions answered
- What is the main cost-saving claim of the video?
- The video claims you can achieve comparable performance to a Jellyfish storage system for around one fifth of the price by using all solid-state components with TrueNAS Core and a careful hardware selection.
- What software is used instead of Jellyfish’s default stack?
- TrueNAS Core, which uses the ZFS file system and provides a more user-friendly management interface, is used instead of Jellyfish's original CentOS-based setup.
- Which hardware enables high reliability and expansion in the build?
- An AMD EPYC processor, ASRock Rack EPYCD8-2T motherboard, dual 10 GbE NICs, and a LSI 9305-6i HBA, plus a chassis with many drive bays, enable reliability and expansion.
- How is data protection maintained with large multi-drive arrays?
- Data protection is maintained with RAID-Z2 groups of 10 drives, allowing for two drive failures per group without data loss, given the right distribution of failures.