AMD just proved they're not your friend - Threadripper Pro 5000 Announcement
0 up · 0 down · 0 ratings
Promos
Visit squarespace.com and use offer code LTT for 10% off Create your build at buildredux.com Threadripper upended the HEDT market when it released, but now it seems the more expensive Threadripper PRO is here to take over. Is AMD making a mistake, or is enthusiast HEDT simply obsolete? Discuss on the forum: linustechtips.com ► GET MERCH: lttstore.com ► AFFILIATES, SPONSORS & REFERRALS: lmg.gg ► PODCAST GEAR: lmg.gg ► SUPPORT US ON FLOATPLANE: floatplane.com FOLLOW US ELSEWHERE --------------------------------------------------- Twitter: twitter.com Facebook: @LinusTech Instagram: @linustech TikTok: @linustech Twitch: twitch.tv MUSIC CREDIT --------------------------------------------------- Intro: Laszlo - Supernova Video Link: youtube.com iTunes Download Link: itunes.apple.com Artist Link: soundcloud.com Outro: Approaching Nirvana - Sugar High Video Link: youtube.com Listen on Spotify: spoti.fi Artist Link: youtube.com Intro animation by MBarek Abdelwassaa @mbarek_abdel Monitor And Keyboard by vadimmihalkevich / CC BY 4.0 geni.us Mechanical RGB Keyboard by BigBrotherECE / CC BY 4.0 geni.us Mouse Gamer free Model By Oscar Creativo / CC BY 4.0 geni.us CHAPTERS --------------------------------------------------- 0:00 Intro 1:08 What AMD announced 1:45 What AMD didn't announce - And why 2:57 Why bother with Threadripper at all then? 3:24 What killed HEDT? 5:12 Why HEDT no longer makes sense 9:05 Conclusion - If you're "PRO", you can still buy it
The video opens with a provocative framing around AMD's Threadripper lineup, establishing the premise that Threadripper Pro 5000 marks a shift away from consumer availability and toward an OEM driven model. The host recaps the Zen 3 based Threadripper Pro 5000 as a refinement over the 3000 series, emphasizing higher clock speeds, improved memory controllers, larger caches across the eight-core CCX arrangement, and enterprise features such as increased memory capacity, more PCIe lanes, and a higher price tag. The discussion quickly pivots to the question of why AMD would push Threadripper Pro instead of cheaper non-pro Threadrippers, and whether socket support like sTRX4 has effectively been sunset. The host argues that this move aligns with a broader corporate strategy to maximize profits, highlighting the legal and financial pressures on a publicly traded company to prioritize shareholder value, which can hinge on premium pro SKUs rather than consumer chips. The narrative then places Threadripper Pro in the context of the decline of the HEDT market, noting that Intel has not released a true HEDT platform in years and that Ryzen began cannibalizing consumer platforms with high core counts, PCIe Gen 4, and improved memory bandwidth. The host reflects on historical threads around Threadripper’s purpose and user demand, concluding that the current market emphasis is shifting toward consumer CPUs with broad platform support and more mature ecosystems, even as Threadripper Pro stays relevant for certain workloads. The overall takeaway is a strategic reorientation: AMD is signaling that Threadripper Pro serves a dedicated pro market while mainstream and prosumer needs may be more effectively met by upcoming consumer hardware, and there is a push to reassess personal computing strategies in light of PCIe Gen 5, DDR5, and evolving memory architectures.
Topics · technology · hardware · market_trends · consumer_electronics
Questions answered
- What is Threadripper Pro 5000, and how does it differ from the non-pro Threadripper lineup?
- Threadripper Pro 5000 is a Zen 3 based refresh designed for OEMs with enterprise features, higher memory capacity and channels, more PCIe lanes, and a higher price. It is positioned between consumer Ryzen and Epyc, focusing on pro workloads rather than retail enthusiasts.
- Why does AMD focus on pro SKUs rather than cheaper consumer Threadrippers?
- The video argues that AMD, as a publicly traded company, has incentives to maximize profits for shareholders, which can push them toward premium pro SKUs and enterprise features rather than expanding a consumer SKUs line that would cannibalize their own products.
- Should enthusiasts still pursue Threadripper Pro, or wait for consumer platforms?
- The host suggests reassessing needs, noting that consumer CPUs with PCIe Gen 5 and DDR5 are maturing and may meet many workloads more cost-effectively, while Threadripper Pro remains relevant for specific professional scenarios.