Entry № 041-2 / V-154 · 0:00 synced

Dyson is Back… Why Do These Exist?

Marques Brownlee@mkbhd4.9M viewsAug 26, 202410:39
Source
YT
Views
4.9M
Subscribers
21M
Critic
?
Audience
?

0 up · 0 down · 0 ratings

Promos

Dyson already made the ridiculous air filter headphones. Now they're back. The original Dyson nightmare: youtu.be MKBHD Merch: shop.mkbhd.com Tech I'm using right now: amazon.com Playlist of MKBHD Intro music: goo.gl Headphones provided by Dyson for review. ~ twitter.com @MKBHD @MKBHD

Start
AI OverviewDefault language

Dyson returns to the headphone scene with a product that reimagines the brand’s approach to audio. The review sets the stage by recalling Dyson’s previous wearable air purifier, labeling it a misfire, and then contrasts that with a new, more traditional headphone form factor priced at $500. The host highlights the design philosophy, emphasizing heavy yet balanced weight distribution, replaceable ear cups and back plates, and a modular aesthetic that invites customization. He notes the practical, real world features such as a functional off button, on-head detection, and multi-point connectivity, while simultaneously calling out some quirks like a finicky touch-cap control and a loud onboarding chime. In comparing with AirPods Max, the reviewer argues that Dyson positions these headphones as a serious alternative, aiming to outdo Apple on several fronts including battery life, where Dyson touts over 50 hours with active noise cancellation. The evaluation acknowledges the premium build with all-metal construction, a clever joystick-like control, and interchangeable parts, yet remains skeptical about whether the price and gimmickry justify the experience when stacked against the broader high-end headphone market. The verdict suggests that while the Dyson headphones are well-built and feature-rich, they still struggle to surpass established competitors in core areas like sound stage and overall value, making the product feel like a bold, if pricey, risk for the brand. Finally, the reviewer wraps with a pragmatic takeaway: Dyson has shipped something, but the product sits in a niche where it competes with strong players and largely depends on whether the user values customization and a different design language over proven performance. The video moves from context to hands-on evaluation, then to hardware specifics and sound analysis, before finishing with a verdict on value and market positioning. Viewers get a sense that Dyson is leveraging its engineering credibility to push into premium headphones while retaining the brand’s flair for modular design. The host’s comparison to AirPods Max provides a clear benchmark for enthusiasts, and the discussion of battery life as a standout feature helps anchor the headphones in practical use cases. Overall, the review blends objective measurements with subjective listening impressions to present a nuanced view of a product that is provocative but not definitive in its appeal.

Topics · technology · audio · consumer_electronics · product_reviews

Questions answered

What is the price of the Dyson headphones and how does it compare to competitors?
The Dyson headphones retail at 500 USD, which is cheaper than some rivals like AirPods Max but still pricey for many listeners; discounts have appeared bringing prices down to around 310 USD at times.
Are these headphones compatible with both iPhone and Android devices?
Yes, the headphones work with both iPhone and Android devices and support multi-point connectivity.
How does the sound quality compare to AirPods Max and what are the notable audio features?
Sound is solid but generally falls short of AirPods Max in most genres by about 10 to 25 percent. They offer customizable EQ with three presets, a wide soundstage that is open but not extremely expansive, and strong battery life but with some caveats on instrument separation.