Intel has NO idea what to do…
0 up · 0 down · 0 ratings
Promos
Check out the Nuforce EDC IEM's on Massdrop at dro.ps Use code LINUS to save 40% on Madrinas Coffee at lmg.gg It's time for new high-end CPUs! Except this one's not looking so fresh... Has Intel just given up fighting AMD? Buy a Core i9 9980XE: oh wait you can't yet Buy a Core i9 7980XE for some reason: On Amazon: geni.us On Newegg: lmg.gg Buy a Threadripper 2990WX: On Amazon: geni.us On Newegg: lmg.gg Buy a Threadripper 2950X: On Amazon: geni.us On Newegg: lmg.gg Discuss on the forum: linustechtips.com Our Affiliates, Referral Programs, and Sponsors: linustechtips.com Get Private Internet Access today at geni.us Linus Tech Tips merchandise at designbyhumans.com Linus Tech Tips posters at crowdmade.com Our Test Benches on Amazon: amazon.com Our production gear: geni.us Twitter - twitter.com Facebook - @LinusTech Instagram - @linustech Twitch - twitch.tv Intro Screen Music Credit: Title: Laszlo - Supernova Video Link: youtube.com iTunes Download Link: itunes.apple.com Artist Link: soundcloud.com Outro Screen Music Credit: Approaching Nirvana - Sugar High youtube.com Sound effects provided by freesfx.co.uk
Intel has no clear path forward with its high end CPUs, and this video argues that the new 18 core Core i9 9980 Xe is not a dramatic improvement over the previous 7980 Xe. The host notes there is no new manufacturing process, no extra cores, and no major chipset refresh, yet the company still claims higher clocks and performance. The key twist is that Intel’s approach focuses on tweaking voltage curves and turbo behavior rather than boosting cores or cooling efficiency, resulting in a soldered heat spreader and a Power/thermals story that doesn’t translate into a simple performance win. In testing, the reviewer highlights inconsistent gains across workloads, with notable advantages in certain productivity benchmarks like 7-zip and Cinebench, while gaming performance remains underwhelming for a chip of this caliber. The video emphasizes that the measured gains depend heavily on AVX workload handling, and that the all-core boost is weaker than expected in some scenarios, making the overall upgrade feel uneven. Finally, the host cautions viewers to take box clock speeds with skepticism and questions the value proposition for professionals who would actually use a 2000-dollar processor for demanding workloads. The discussion closes with practical takeaways about power draw, thermals, and the lack of transparency from Intel regarding all-core boost data.
Topics · technology · hardware · reviews · processors
Questions answered
- What is the main architectural status of the Core i9 9980xe compared to its predecessor?
- The 9980xe is not built on a new manufacturing process and shares many core design aspects with the 7980xe; it is more of a clock and voltage curve refresh than a ground-up redesign.
- How does the 9980xe perform in AVX workloads versus non-AVX workloads?
- In AVX-512 workloads the processor runs at about 2.8 GHz across all cores, while turning AVX off raises all-core boost to around 3.8 GHz, with higher power draw; non-AVX workloads see some performance gains mainly from higher base boosts but not uniformly across all tasks.