Entry № 041-5 / V-144 · 0:00 synced

SIDEMEN RANK THE WORLD'S BEST BURGER

MoreSidemen@MoreSidemen4.5M viewsAug 23, 202529:59
Source
YT
Views
4.5M
Subscribers
9.7M
Critic
?
Audience
?

0 up · 0 down · 0 ratings

Description

twitter.com HARRY (W2S)

twitter.com VIK (Vikkstar123)

twitter.com JJ (KSI)

Channels and socials

: Order food NOW at: eatsides.com : Access exclusive content at: sideplus.com : XIX Vodka: xixvodka.com : Subscribe to our Reacts Channel: youtube.com

: Sidemen Clothing: sidemenclothing.com : Sidemen Instagram: @Sidemen : Sidemen Twitter: twitter.com Hot House Games: hothousegames.com SIDEMEN JOSH (Zerkaa)

youtube.com

youtube.com

@Zerkaa

youtube.com

youtube.com

@Wroetoshaw

youtube.com

youtube.com

youtube.com

@Vikkstagram

youtube.com

youtube.com

@KSI

youtube.com

youtube.com

@Tobjizzle

youtube.com

youtube.com

@Behzingagram

youtube.com

youtube.com

@Miniminter

Start
AI OverviewDefault language

Sidemen rank the world’s best burger in a fast-paced, food-competition style video that blends bite-sized tasting, light banter, and rough, crowd-pleasing rankings. The group opens by establishing their mission to evaluate a wide spectrum of burgers from well-known chains to boutique spots, starting with Shake Shack. They discuss how the burger should be judged, whether to rank it as it arrives or how it tastes prepared at the counter, and whether modifications should influence placement. The crew then dives into an initial lineup, sampling each burger with blunt, humorous commentary, mid-session debates, and a few surprising positives and harsh notes that keep the tone lively and funny. Throughout the first segment, the Sidemen express strong opinions about buns, beef texture, and sauces, often splitting rankings and prompting playful squabbles that feel genuine and entertaining rather than scripted. Their dynamic emerges as a core value of the video: different palates collide, but camaraderie remains, and the group gradually calibrates their scale while acknowledging standout flavors like brioche texture, caramelized onions, and unique sauces. In the middle portion, tension builds around more unconventional takes such as a toast-based “sandwich” style burger and a breakfast burger with egg and avocado, which some members defend with passion while others question the burger’s classification, yet everyone keeps the energy high with bold claims and quick pivots. The crew also highlights specific technical details, from the impact of cross-section cuts to the way cheese and sauce interact with the beef, which adds a layer of authenticity to their critique even as the jokes fly fast. As the tasting progresses, the group uses a shared, evolving ranking system to place each burger in relation to their current favorites, with winners earning a potential S rank while others settle for A, B, or C. In the later stretch they tackle more polarizing entries, such as a “toasty” bun burger with strong onion caramelization or a heavily sauced, stacked option that divides opinions on texture versus flavor profile. The video builds toward a closing debrief where a few bets are settled, some burgers are resituated, and the Sidemen settle on a final consensus that favors a few standout burgers but also acknowledges how some entries confounded expectations. The overall takeaway emphasizes the fun of trying new things, the value of honest, spirited critique, and the playful tension between personal taste and group consensus, delivering a satisfying blend of entertainment and edible critique. The conclusion reinforces that, regardless of the exact order, the experience is about the shared moment, the reactions, and the chemistry of the Sidemen as they explore what makes a burger memorable.

Topics · food_review · challenge · entertainment · comedy · series

Questions answered

What criteria did the Sidemen use to judge each burger and did it change during the video?
The group discussed judging the burgers both by how they arrived and how they tasted, indicating a preference for evaluating taste as served. They debated whether modifications or presentation should affect the ranking, and at times adjusted their scores based on texture, bun quality, beef flavor, and sauces.
Which burger sparked the strongest debate and why?
A few burgers sparked debate, notably the toast-based burger and the breakfast burger with egg and avocado, where opinions split on whether the toast made it a burger or a sandwich, and on whether extra toppings improved or hindered flavor balance.
Did the Sidemen consider nonstandard burgers as legitimate entries in the ranking?
Yes, they considered nontraditional formats like the toast-based burger and the breakfast burger as legitimate contenders, evaluating their flavor, texture, and overall eating experience, though opinions varied on whether they fit classic burger definitions.