Nvidia goes OPEN-SOURCE??
0 up · 0 down · 0 ratings
Promos
Save 10% on XSplit's video tools at lmg.gg ► LISTEN TO THE TECH NEWS: lmg.gg ►GET MERCH: lttstore.com ►SUPPORT US ON FLOATPLANE: floatplane.com ►LTX EXPO: ltxexpo.com NEWS SOURCES: lmg.gg --------------------------------------------------- Timestamps: 0:00 SHORTCIRCUIT INVASION 0:13 Nvidia's "Open Source" Linux drivers 1:29 Texas HB 20 social media law 2:34 TerraUSD crypto crash continues 3:38 Xplit 4:18 SHORT CIRCUITS 4:28 FSR 2.0 launches in Deathloop 5:07 USB-C iPhone in 2023 5:43 GPU game bundles 6:23 Starfield, Redfall delayed 6:45 Project Cambria demo FOLLOW US ELSEWHERE --------------------------------------------------- Twitter: twitter.com Instagram: @TechLinkedYT Facebook: @TechLinked
Nvidia has taken an unusual step by publishing its Linux graphic kernel modules as open-source software, sparking a mixed mix of praise and skepticism within the tech community. The move is framed as a partial openness: Nvidia has opened some driver components, but a large portion resides in the graphics card firmware and remains not fully open-source. This means the driver can be bundled with Linux distributions and support may improve for certain GPUs, but community input about the broader driver development is limited due to the firmware boundaries and only periodic updates from Nvidia. The discussion highlights that AMD has historically open-sourced broader driver components, including FreeSync and Vulkan, making Nvidia’s approach appear more conservative and deliberately selective. Viewers are encouraged to interpret this as a stepping stone toward wider openness, with some arguing it could pave the way for more complete openness in the future while others worry about the pace and scope of community contributions. The segment also touches on the practical implications for Linux users, including easier out-of-the-box GPU support and the ongoing tension between open-source ideals and proprietary software strategies. In summary, Nvidia’s open-source gesture is notable but nuanced, signaling gradual progress rather than a wholesale shift away from proprietary architecture. The broader takeaway is that Linux and open-source advocates see both opportunity and constraints in this staged openness, with the potential to influence how Linux distributions package and maintain Nvidia GPUs going forward.
Topics · technology · open_source · hardware · linux
Questions answered
- What exactly did Nvidia publish as open-source for Linux, and what remains closed?
- Nvidia published the graphic kernel modules as open-source software, but the firmware that runs on the GPUs remains closed, and the driver still has limited alpha support and will receive periodic updates from Nvidia.
- Why is this move significant for Linux users and distributions?
- Opening driver components can simplify inclusion in Linux distributions and improve out-of-the-box GPU support, reducing installation friction, even if full driver openness and broad community input are not yet realized.