I Hope Google Doesn’t Ban Us... - Abusing Unlimited Google Drive
0 up · 0 down · 0 ratings
Promos
Receive an additional $25 credit for Ting today when you use code LINUS2018 at linus2018.ting.com Buy noblechairs ICON Series Real Leather Gaming Chair on Amazon at geni.us Buy HDDs on Amazon: geni.us Sign up for G Suite using our affiliate link at goo.gl Discuss on the forum: linustechtips.com Our Affiliates, Referral Programs, and Sponsors: linustechtips.com Linus Tech Tips merchandise at designbyhumans.com Linus Tech Tips posters at crowdmade.com Our Test Benches on Amazon: amazon.com Our production gear: geni.us Twitter - twitter.com Facebook - @LinusTech Instagram - @linustech Twitch - twitch.tv Intro Screen Music Credit: Title: Laszlo - Supernova Video Link: youtube.com iTunes Download Link: itunes.apple.com Artist Link: soundcloud.com Outro Screen Music Credit: Approaching Nirvana - Sugar High youtube.com Sound effects provided by freesfx.co.uk
The video documents Linus Tech Tips' ambitious Petabyte Project, a multi-terabyte archival backup strategy that began with a one-stop solution but revealed critical problems. The team explains that their initial setup was not geo-redundant, risking total loss in a disaster, so they explored alternatives to back up 370 terabytes plus future data. They evaluate several approaches, including local on-site storage, tape libraries, and cloud options, weighing upfront costs against long-term practicality and ongoing expenses. Their exploration highlights the limitations of high-capacity hardware, including the staggering costs of decked-out storage and the upfront burden of dual rack setups. They then turn to cloud storage, specifically AWS Glacier, and uncover pricing quirks such as data retrieval fees and egress costs that could undermine the supposed cost advantages. The discussion pivots to a more affordable, albeit unconventional, workaround: leveraging Google Drive’s claimed unlimited storage tier through multiple G Suite accounts, while acknowledging Google’s per-day upload limits and throttling behavior. The team sets up a Windows VM and uses the rclone tool to test the unlimited tier across several user accounts, discovering that the so-called unlimited storage is effectively capped by a daily upload limit. They calculate that at 750 GB per day per account, a full restoration would be impractical, potentially stretching over years if attempted at scale. Unable to sustain the project under the unlimited-glass illusion, they present a revised plan that exploits the per-user limit with multiple accounts to reach a higher aggregate throughput, achieving a usable 40–45 MB/s upload speed across several instances. In the end, the Linus Tech Tips crew concludes that the cheapest viable option is using five G Suite accounts with limited daily uploads, offering encryption, no data pull fees, and a lower total annual cost compared to other solutions. They acknowledge the ethical gray area of bypassing a major provider’s intended limits while noting the ongoing uncertainty of Google’s enforcement and the potential for change. The video closes with practical takeaways and a teaser about future investigations, while also mentioning sponsorships and community resources for viewers who want to dig deeper or participate in related discussions.
Topics · technology · cloud storage · data backup · online services · video blogs · hardware infrastructure
Questions answered
- What storage solution did Linus Tech Tips finally consider most cost-effective for multi-terabyte backups?
- Five G Suite accounts with restricted daily uploads offered the lowest upfront and ongoing costs while providing encryption and no data pull fees.
- Why did the unlimited Google Drive approach fail for their petabyte-scale backup?
- The unlimited storage claim was misleading because Google imposes a per-user daily upload limit, making full-scale backup impractical.
- What is a key risk of relying on a single geo-nonredundant storage deployment?
- A disaster could wipe the entire back catalog if data is not replicated across separate geographic locations.